Originally posted by Modri
You're high. It takes at least 15 seconds just to get a response from someone typing on a keyboard. So assuming everyone types ONE response to the GM when they arrive, and the GM can then leave, and that the GM is answering queue requests without pausing for any reason whatsoever, yes they could handle that many calls.
You're what we like to call "a liar".
You're high. It takes at least 15 seconds just to get a response from someone typing on a keyboard. So assuming everyone types ONE response to the GM when they arrive, and the GM can then leave, and that the GM is answering queue requests without pausing for any reason whatsoever, yes they could handle that many calls.
You're what we like to call "a liar".
The point of it is just because they respond to you fast has no real basis in the number of calls they get. Put a little more logic and listen before starting to throw accusations, it was like I was talking to a wall in a previous thread and getting the same on this one.
Look up the words approximates and/or estimates, the numbers are not actual but based on BEST or depending on how you look at it WORST case scenarios. Also depending when you consider the time to start and end with each request changes everything as well.
You going to consider the time that someone is writing the request to send to the GM as part of the time for the GM to respond? Sounds silly to me to consider that time as part of it but then yes it will reduce the numbers. What you want to assume that the GM spends at least 5 min. with each one?
Then from my previous mathmatics adding those asinine changes you still have 20,160 requests done in the approximation of a week and 1,048,320 a year if there are 30 GMs working only on a 8hr basis.
20k reports on bugs or other problems seems extreemly small to me. That's a measly 4% with just 500k users, there is just no way that there is 96% of the entire populous that doesn't care what's going or is doing something of an illegal action. If you wanted to debate 50% against me I might accept that but that still shoots the number of reports/requests much higher then 20k a week.
EDIT:
Ok, re-adjusted my mathmatics and went by estimates that reports only occur in heavily populated areas. Assuming that each of the populated areas have 300 people each that's about 22% - 33% of the population aware of the event doing something.
Alright that sounds more reasonable in an estimation. in any case though all I was trying to get across is that the GMs most likely do get a lot of requests and demanding immediate action isn't likely. It takes time but when the action is done it'll make an impact enough that anything extra we decide to do in line with it just complies to make that action even greater.
Almost forgetting the reason why I was posting on this thread, if I remember right it was something started about someone saying that the GMs doing nothing or nothing going to be done about the gil buyers/sellers and we shouldn't be "jerks" to try and hinder the gil buyers/sellers growth because it'll have no effect (Terrible logic and way of thinking I might add).



Comment