Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The E3 2011 thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cheezeman3000
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    Great ideas, and I agree, asymmetric gameplay is just fine and dandy, but I still feel like they're limiting themselves (and totally going against their historical preference for local multiplayer) by not including at least the option for symmetric gameplay as well. A classic example of the extra options this provides can be seen in sports games, where you can hide which plays you've picked (or what type of pitch you've thrown) from the other people in the room, and other examples can be seen in the original Four Swords and Crystal Chronicles games which required each player to have their own view of the action... while playing in the same room as everyone else.

    In the end, I dunno, I mean, I'm sure the system will be great even if it's limited to just one tablet, but I still feel that there will be so many missed opportunities...

    On another note, we can all breathe easy, apparently it can run Crysis. Lol: http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/14/w...ul-than-ps3-a/

    Leave a comment:


  • jenova_9
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread



    very informative, mew!

    Leave a comment:


  • Omgwtfbbqkitten
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    The big problem with asymmetric gameplay is that it's tough to balance. And you would generally only use it for multiplayer since it does sort of presuppose more than 1 player. >_>
    Mindjack agrees.
    Demon's Souls disagrees.

    The fact of the matter is that few developers try to push asymmetric play outside of the known conventions. A decade old game like Neverwinter Nights didn't have a separate touch interface and there's nothing stopping such a game from letting a DM create the dungeons/secrets/puzzles in advance and allow them to place enemies or enhance traps on the fly and scale that based on the skill of the players.

    Demon Souls only has one mode - killing you. Doesn't much matter if its an NPC or some phantom player. Seems cruel to let some players jump you in your game, but they're laced with limitation regarding how often they could do it and its only a worthwhile venture if they can win. They can only pick on other players their level, after all.

    But let's think of it in terms of something like Zelda Four Swords.

    All you'd have to really do is balance the abilities of the DM with that of the players he's challenging. Wouldn't be right for a DM to just plop down a high end monster that could kill the other players if they didn't have the right item, you'd have to build the level with that item to defeat it or the fight just doesn't work.

    And there's nothing to say you couldn't just pre-make the dungeon and do monster placement or enhance traps on the fly while your dungeon crawlers were making their way through. You'd be able to see their progress in real-time on your screen.

    Its something that could stand to be explored more deeply. Just because its not perfect or its been done on PC doesn't mean its been fully explored and certainly not on the level of consoles or non-LAN/online play. I can think of a few developers that could make great use of such a tool.
    Last edited by Omgwtfbbqkitten; 06-14-2011, 10:56 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Malacite
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    Originally posted by Firewind View Post
    Both Flynn and the Patty (the pirate girl) are playable party members in the PS3 version. I'm horrible at reading kanji and katakana, but the plot changes slightly to put them in but nothing major is changed overall.
    How the hell does that work though?

    Making Flynn playable changes the plot quite a bit...


    And I'm assuming you mean Holy Rain? I tried doing Estelle's 100-man last night, and omfg talk about aggravating. I lost to Droite & Gauche, though I didn't really know what I was doing XD - I've been using Yuri the entire time (I'm on my 1st playthrough still, doing as much as I can before I do a completionist run next) so it was freaking awkward as hell trying to figure out what arts to set and chain together as Judith. I still managed to win as both Judy & Yuri though since I was basically taking 0~1 damage from everything ROFL.


    <.< also I don't actually like that phrase in my sig XD it's just more of a tribute to Rita than anything. Tidal Wave is a bitching spell but holy fuck it just gets annoying after spending so much time grade farming doing 10 minute battles at a time and hearing nothing but "BLAH BLAH BLAH TIDAL WAVE!!" over & over & over >_>b

    Leave a comment:


  • Firewind
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    Originally posted by Malacite View Post
    WTF is up with the little pirate girl on the PS3 version anyway? And I saw gameplay with Flynn instead of Yuri... is that just a DLC/extra costume for Yuri? Otherwise that's a MAJOR change to the game's plot.
    Both Flynn and the Patty (the pirate girl) are playable party members in the PS3 version. I'm horrible at reading kanji and katakana, but the plot changes slightly to put them in but nothing major is changed overall.

    Oh and if you love "Blah, blah, blah, Tidal Wave!" Try using Estelle in the arena. If you thought that Rita was OP, you have seen nothing until you have seen what is essentially a White mage that can make herself immune to all damage and spam Holy-ga on every enemy on the screen continuously until you need to use another limit bottle. Rita can actually be killed, Estelle simply can't even in standard battles unless you are horrible at the game.

    Leave a comment:


  • Icemage
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    Originally posted by Omgwtfbbqkitten View Post
    I don't see what's confusing here, you're just assuming all things must be symmetrical which is untrue of most of the games you play and mostly only true for multiplayer.
    The big problem with asymmetric gameplay is that it's tough to balance. And you would generally only use it for multiplayer since it does sort of presuppose more than 1 player. >_>

    That said, sometimes asymmetric works (Giants: Citizen Kabuto, Starcraft). But the broken trail of horribly uninteresting asymmetric multiplayer games is quite long (Super Mario Galaxy's 2nd player Wiimote comes immediately to mind, Haze is a good example of asymmetric FPS, Dune 2000 would be my poster child for poor RTS asymmetry, etc.)

    Damn, now I want someone to make a tabletop style RPG for this thing. Just imagine the ease of building levels and monster-placement on a touch-screen - on-the-fly, even. You could build the scenarios in real-time as other people played.
    Making campaigns on-the-fly is pretty much a pipe dream The closest tool I've seen for something like this is the DM Toolkit for iOS, and even that doesn't alleviate all the horrendous number-crunching.

    Generally speaking, if you're running a pen and paper role playing game, you should be busy with presentation, not world-building during a session. For a more RPG-lite computerized sort of game played in real time, you run a serious risk of same-old-same-old because of a limited box of tools (see: Neverwinter Nights).


    Icemage

    Leave a comment:


  • Kailea
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    Originally posted by Omgwtfbbqkitten View Post
    Damn, now I want someone to make a tabletop style RPG for this thing. Just imagine the ease of building levels and monster-placement on a touch-screen - on-the-fly, even. You could build the scenarios in real-time as other people played.
    holy crap there needs to be a way to Mega-thank you.......

    Leave a comment:


  • Omgwtfbbqkitten
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    Originally posted by Cheezeman3000 View Post
    I personally think the whole idea behind the Wii U is broken if we can't use multiple screen-controllers per system. So many opportunities will be wasted without that capability. I wonder what the reasoning is? Does the system not have the processing power required to display 4 lower-res screens at once (in addition to the TV)? If processing power is their only limitation, then, considering Nintendo's history of putting local multiplayer as one of their top priorities, it confuses me as to why they aren't fixing it. Surely the addition of enough processing power to run at least two tablets at once would be worth the cost, considering their usual emphasis on local multiplayer.

    Sometimes, you confuse me Nintendo.
    I don't see what's confusing here, you're just assuming all things must be symmetrical which is untrue of most of the games you play and mostly only true for multiplayer. Sometimes not even then

    The dealer is an active participant in Blackjack, but he does not make bets - you do that and you're playing against him just as much as anyone else at the table. When you do a tabletop/pen-and-paper RPG you have the DM and you have the players. The DM is playing, too, but he's not playing the same way you're playing. Nor is the catcher on a baseball field - he can't suddenly be the outfielder. The commander of a military strike isn't fighting on the frontlines. And the kid that's "it" in hide-n-seek has to hide while the others are looking for hime.

    When you play Halo, yes, pretty much everyone is subject to the same or similar conditions, just like Mario Kart puts everyone under the same rules even if their characters have a slightly different balance.

    If Nintendo were to make a game where one player is the dungeon master - why would everyone need the same controller the DM has. He's not subject to the same rules. If its a game of hide-and-seek, the controller would give a tactical advantage to the guy that's it - much moreso than if he was hiding on a split-screen where everyone can see him or is honor-bound to pretend they're not looking at his corner of the screen.

    So no, I don't think ever home multiplayer game requires everyone to have the tablet. Since Wiimotes are something everyone else could have only the player engaged in an asymmetrical role would need the Wii U tablet.

    Damn, now I want someone to make a tabletop style RPG for this thing. Just imagine the ease of building levels and monster-placement on a touch-screen - on-the-fly, even. You could build the scenarios in real-time as other people played.

    Leave a comment:


  • Malacite
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    WTF is up with the little pirate girl on the PS3 version anyway? And I saw gameplay with Flynn instead of Yuri... is that just a DLC/extra costume for Yuri? Otherwise that's a MAJOR change to the game's plot.


    EDIT: http://www.joystiq.com/2011/06/13/si...ed-homecoming/


    Visually, at least, Downpour appears to be on par with Homecoming, the most recent Silent Hill to grace the Xbox 360 and PS3; however, Downpour marks the first time the series has adopted the Unreal Engine. I'd say the game still needs some optimization -- I noticed some bad texture fade-in and a few missing effects -- but the engine is more than capable of rendering Silent Hill's trademark gloom.

    Last edited by Malacite; 06-13-2011, 07:36 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cheezeman3000
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    I personally think the whole idea behind the Wii U is broken if we can't use multiple screen-controllers per system. So many opportunities will be wasted without that capability. I wonder what the reasoning is? Does the system not have the processing power required to display 4 lower-res screens at once (in addition to the TV)? If processing power is their only limitation, then, considering Nintendo's history of putting local multiplayer as one of their top priorities, it confuses me as to why they aren't fixing it. Surely the addition of enough processing power to run at least two tablets at once would be worth the cost, considering their usual emphasis on local multiplayer.

    Sometimes, you confuse me Nintendo.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gobo
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    Originally posted by Malacite View Post
    <.< I still refuse to buy anything Capcom until they stop taking their fanbase for granted and ditch the bullshit gouging.
    I was referring to this. Fans for years have BEGGED Namco to release Destiny 2, Rebirth, Innocence, Hearts, Graces (which is getting released as the F version), plus the Vesperia, Symphonia, Phantasia (the good ones, not the shitty GBA one) Destiny, Destiny 2, and Rebirth remakes in the west and until VERY recently, have been given the cold shoulder. And even though Abyss 3D* and Graces F are getting released in the west, Xillia will be out in Japan in September, right smack dab in the middle of both the western releases of the other two games. There has been no word in ToX will be released outside Japan.


    *It's also completely half-assed. They are just cutting and pasting the voice work from the PS2 game, so no voices for skits.

    Leave a comment:


  • Raydeus
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    Yeah, it's EA... again. orz

    Probably has to do with the maps from the special *coughoverpricedcough* edition.

    Leave a comment:


  • jenova_9
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    I heard some people are in an uproar just because Battlefield 3 announced it's having 1st day DLC or something, mew.

    Leave a comment:


  • Raydeus
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    Did anyone post this video already? I looked for it but didn't find it oddly enough.












    Sadly it's EA... again. orz

    Leave a comment:


  • jenova_9
    replied
    Re: The E3 2011 thread

    People noticed the USS member names, mew!

    Hector Hivers (Beltway)
    Michaela Scheider (Bertha)
    Vladimir Bodrovski (Spectre)
    Christine Yamata (Four Eyes)
    Karena Lesproux (Lupo)

    Vector real name is a mystery. but it's confirmed HUNK (James Cooper) was his mentor.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X