So... Starcraft 2?

[Malacite]

Re: So... Starcraft 2?

Eh, I'm not even going near SC2 until they announce some kind of collection with all 3 bundled at a discount.

[jenova_9]

Re: So... Starcraft 2?

well make friends with 2 more that communicate and you'll have a good fun army made up of 4 generals instead of 2. You may be able to cover each other's weaknesses better.

[DakAttack]

Re: So... Starcraft 2?

4v4 is more fun! More cooperation and excitement mew!

Cooperation required or actual cooperation? Playing with a friend means we can actually cooperate.

[jenova_9]

Re: So... Starcraft 2?

4v4 is more fun! More cooperation and excitement mew!

[DakAttack]

Is anybody playing? I could use some discussion on tactics. I've got a 2-man team with a friend of mine, and we're ranked 39th in the silver league, but he's not very good at giving me advice.

As far as I can tell there's three phases to any given match: rush, harass, and the finale. You've got to consider a rush depending on your opponents' races. This typically means walling, but depending on the opponent you would use different units. You've also got to consider how your opponent might harass you, because it's more possible now than in the original. Then, you've got the finale and you need to plan what your end goal is for unit production.

I'm still pretty bad at expanding while tech'ing, but I've had a few good matches tonight. I really suffer from building too much of a good thing. If something works I tend to stick with it, which is a problem because opponents tend to adapt.