Originally posted by forze
Well Mr. Monk..most drk sub thf post 65....Thf sub = less dmg. Now compare yourself to a Drk/War with top of the line equipment, i can assure you the only mob that your ganna outdmg us are bone type monster. And you outdmging a ranger maybe on bones, but anything else they put your dmg to shame. Well my 2 cents. Peace OUT.
Well Mr. Monk..most drk sub thf post 65....Thf sub = less dmg. Now compare yourself to a Drk/War with top of the line equipment, i can assure you the only mob that your ganna outdmg us are bone type monster. And you outdmging a ranger maybe on bones, but anything else they put your dmg to shame. Well my 2 cents. Peace OUT.

now, Ross, imo I say player before job. If you are a good player with good gear you'll out preform a mediocre or poor player regardless of your job. Thing is many great DRK's have told me the same things you say, only themselves out dmging everything



Glad to see you replying. This is the guy who first got my ideas churning about DRK and MNK. So...I BLAME YOU, ROSS! :spin: Anyway, I can kinda see the good and bad of both sides. No matter what anybody says, now, I'm going to be a DRK no matter what. Why? Well, because regardless of which is the "better class", I prefer the DRKs sense of style more so than the MNKs. All that Japanese hoo-ha just isn't for me. I just like the looks and playstyle of a DRK better than a MNKs. Why? Becasue I've had other MNK friends being told to their faces that they're only in a PT for their weapons. That's it. And while any DRK or MNK will biasedly tell you they do the most damage, to me, it doesn't matter. Either way, DRK end up having a bigger role in the PT than just being there for their weapon. We cut and paste the monster to the tank, we enable lvl 3 skillchains, we can Drain and Aspir to decrease downtime, and who could forget how useful our absorb spells can be? So that's my reasoning. DRK to the top for me.



Comment