I was obviously arguing about pure stats, taking into account the same skill level between the hume and the galka paladin, it's quite obvious that a good galka paladin is better than an average hume paladin, but when a good galka paladin is compared with a good hume paladin, taking in account the same skill level (and this mean they both can use their toold to the utmost) the hume paladin comes up on top, because he has more tools to work with.
I play a SMN, as a mithra, and I see the same thing when comparing myself to a taru. Yes, they have more mp if they are a SMN (though I have more than one if they are any other mage class) - however, when I am doing exp chains of 5, I never drop below around 260/727 mp - that is with me doing my job AND being secondary healer. The taru is usually left with more than 400 mp at the end - so, how does having that extra mp give you more tools? I'd much rather keep my 600ish hp than get the extra mp - that taru sitting at a bit more than 300hp can be killed almost instantly in exchange for mp that isn't even fully utilized.





Comment