Ops.. i made a few mistakes in my previous post... excluding the grammers and spelling mistakes, here are the corrections..
The moon status before the new moon is the 26th night, not the 29th moon.
The moon status after the new moon is the 3rd day moon, not the 3rd moon.
The percentage tat is quoted in eriwilde's site are separated for moon influence and day influence, the percentage of getting HQ on the optimum day is around 40%, no just 25%. This percentage is obtained from the summing of the 2 different influences. As to whether they should be added together simply by a "+" tat is more of a mathematical problem and none of my concern here.
The moon status before the new moon is the 26th night, not the 29th moon.
The moon status after the new moon is the 3rd day moon, not the 3rd moon.
The percentage tat is quoted in eriwilde's site are separated for moon influence and day influence, the percentage of getting HQ on the optimum day is around 40%, no just 25%. This percentage is obtained from the summing of the 2 different influences. As to whether they should be added together simply by a "+" tat is more of a mathematical problem and none of my concern here.
Comment