Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The implications of a post scarcity world

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • cidbahamut
    replied
    Re: The implications of a post scarcity world

    Originally posted by ItazuraNhomango View Post
    I'd not worry about "There isn't enough work for everyone to be working, but we insist on continuing to work even if it doesn't serve a purpose." Not any time in the near future. Or in the next 50 years. Or in the next 100 years, really.
    Did you listen to the podcast? We're doing that right now.

    Leave a comment:


  • ItazuraNhomango
    replied
    Re: The implications of a post scarcity world

    There seem to be plenty of problems still need solving in this world.

    I'd not worry about "There isn't enough work for everyone to be working, but we insist on continuing to work even if it doesn't serve a purpose." Not any time in the near future. Or in the next 50 years. Or in the next 100 years, really.

    For now (and a very long time to come), if your work isn't serving any (good) purpose, it just means you are working at the wrong job, or working the job wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • Malacite
    replied
    Re: The implications of a post scarcity world

    Yeah, my inner self is like "WOO HOO! Free to pursue all my creative dreams!"

    And at the same time it's tempered by fear of all the SHIT that will innevitibly come to light from some people - particularly Japan >_>

    Leave a comment:


  • cidbahamut
    replied
    Re: The implications of a post scarcity world

    Originally posted by Armando View Post
    Imagine a world where everything on Kickstarter is automatically funded.
    I find this prospect simultaneously beautiful and terrifying.

    Leave a comment:


  • Armando
    replied
    Re: The implications of a post scarcity world

    Originally posted by cidbahamut View Post
    Assuming we eventually reach the technological end-game where everyone has access to machines that dispense our every need at the push of a button, what do we do with ourselves?
    You'd probably end up with two kinds of people: those that produce entertainment content and those that consume it, except those that produce it can now produce whatever the hell they want instead of whatever garbage is currently profitable. You'd have a new Rennaissance for the creative types and an infinite amount of shit to watch for the sit-all-day-watching-TV types.

    Imagine a world where everything on Kickstarter is automatically funded.

    Leave a comment:


  • Malacite
    replied
    Re: The implications of a post scarcity world

    My father and I frequently discuss this any time there's talk about jobs and such in the news.

    Personally I'm all for progress and advancing technology, and my view is that the problem lies more not so much in the tech itself, but what's being done with it. For example, a company brings in a new machine that dramatically increases productivity while also lowering costs by a similar value, thus sky rocketing profits. It's how said profits are handled that often irks me, as the trend thus far has been simply to downsize people (which does make sense) while simultaneously passing the savings straight to the top - CEO's and Boardmembers.


    Fuck paying everyone else a little more now that the company can afford to do so, nah - that would be social progress. Can't have people actually making a decent living off their work, nope, that's only for folks born into money, or the lucky few who through various means find their way to the top of the corporate world.

    Obama gave a fancy speech on inequality today, but methinks it won't amount to shit.

    Leave a comment:


  • cidbahamut
    started a topic The implications of a post scarcity world

    The implications of a post scarcity world

    What America Can't Admit About the 'Millennial' Generation | Cracked.com

    I found this to be a fascinating bit of radio. It examines how as technology advances we become more and more productive with fewer and fewer man-hours of labor, but society seems to be balking the closer we get to the inevitable end-game of that pursuit. Simply put: There isn't enough work for everyone to be working, but we insist on continuing to work even if it doesn't serve a purpose.

    Assuming we eventually reach the technological end-game where everyone has access to machines that dispense our every need at the push of a button, what do we do with ourselves? Does it make sense to continue insisting that everyone continue to show up at their day job or can we as a culture shift our attitude to the point where it's ok for some people to take care of what little work is left while the rest of the population pursues other endeavors?
Working...
X