Crowly by your same logic, acc if absolutely everything, dex advantage means nothing since acc is so much more importent. At least that's what your str vs attk arguement comment implies. Take your post and replace attk with acc, and dex with str, and then you got an elvaan fanboy. You're clearly trying to put down one noticable disadvantage mithras have, and giving the dex advantage too much credit. Although you were right, attk is more importent, but the same can definitely be said for acc over dex.
Go to the monk forums, many elvaans would claim they were the be all, end all kind of mnk because of about 4 more str, and about 6 dex less. To them, they thought str was the world and everything revolved around it. You're just doing the same thing but with mithras and dex. The differences in the stats aren't big enough to have huge impacts on the job itself unless equipment was an issue for X person. One is going to hit slightly more, one is going to hit slightly harder. And crit rate isn't a big issue either. From experience in adding dex, you probably won't see a very noticable effect until at least +20 dex, and especially with more than +25 around my level.
Go to the monk forums, many elvaans would claim they were the be all, end all kind of mnk because of about 4 more str, and about 6 dex less. To them, they thought str was the world and everything revolved around it. You're just doing the same thing but with mithras and dex. The differences in the stats aren't big enough to have huge impacts on the job itself unless equipment was an issue for X person. One is going to hit slightly more, one is going to hit slightly harder. And crit rate isn't a big issue either. From experience in adding dex, you probably won't see a very noticable effect until at least +20 dex, and especially with more than +25 around my level.




I'd much rather invite a trying galka or elvaan DD with average acc than a mithra with almost no acc gear because "dex means everything."




Comment