*Vote* Who does the most damage?

[truong]

Jesus, people STILL think MNKs do more damage than DRK in exp party? And anyone who says "Damage Over Time" in any of their posts automatically don't have a fucking clue.

As for who does the most damage in the optimum situation, I honestly think NINs do. Theorectically, they can do the most damage if they have an infinite supply of gil and are able to afford those 250 D darts lol.

Realistcally, in non exp pt situation, it's BLM, RNG and the rest don't even matter, since BLM and RNG are just on another level completely in terms of dealing raw damage. The rest you can make a good case individually, but int he end, there's no clear cut number 3.

[Aj5000]

Hmmmm i still go with SAM and RNG though. Ninja do have those darts but unless they have 100 PERCENT Accuracy i still think they are considered third but can't compete with a SAM or RNG. Well maybe a SAM but not a RNG. But still i got mad love for Ninja's.

P.S. For all of you that think this thread is "retarded" or it makes no sense then why did u post it is retarded? Makes no sense..... But still we got people that still act noobish..... For those who said it was retarded u really gotta learn some manners or maybe learn how to RESPECT one another.

[Aj5000]

Originally posted by truong
Jesus, people STILL think MNKs do more damage than DRK in exp party? And anyone who says "Damage Over Time" in any of their posts automatically don't have a fucking clue.

As for who does the most damage in the optimum situation, I honestly think NINs do. Theorectically, they can do the most damage if they have an infinite supply of gil and are able to afford those 250 D darts lol.

Realistcally, in non exp pt situation, it's BLM, RNG and the rest don't even matter, since BLM and RNG are just on another level completely in terms of dealing raw damage. The rest you can make a good case individually, but int he end, there's no clear cut number 3.

I agree with most. U make perfect sense. My opinion is how is a monk considered to be a Damage Dealer..? Technically they really don't do "Damage" compared to a DRK, RNG, BLM...... They actually do less or the same as a War

Overall: They do make pretty good tanks! But i really don't consider them as Damage Dealers.

[neighbortaru]

Originally posted by Aj5000
I agree with most. U make perfect sense. My opinion is how is a monk considered to be a Damage Dealer..? Technically they really don't do "Damage" compared to a DRK, RNG, BLM...... They actually do less or the same as a War

Overall: They do make pretty good tanks! But i really don't consider them as Damage Dealers.

Monks are good tanks Oh the humanity.

[711rocks]

I saw a mnk once in Jeuno, (I'm not making this up -_-) who had CC, a scorp harness +1, 2 snipers +1, and a peacock charm. The rest of the gear was great too. I'm pretty sure that person could unleash a world of hurt on anyone.

[bonovoxpsu]

wow. red mage in DEAD LAST. tsk tsk. NOT ONE VOTE?!?!

whm and brd beat us. how sad...

[Cali]

MNK hit twice, may be that's why they are good DD? and.. MNK is by far a good tank, they can tank to a certain extent, but compare to a proper tank... amen..

Anyway, if you compare a MNK's damage on slime, and a DRK's damage on slime, you are just trying to make it unfair... MNKs are said to be good after 60+, because we fight skeletons for sometimes, which is the only thing MNK is good at MNK is the only job with A on blunt-element attack, so it's reasonable to say MNK is a good DD when you are fighting skeleton, but as I know, most players ignore most of the sentence, and so, the saying 'MNK is good DD against skeletons' slowly turned into 'MNK is good DD'... chinese whisper game, right? ^^

[iglak]

Originally posted by Cali
MNK hit twice, may be that's why they are good DD? and.. MNK is by far a good tank, they can tank to a certain extent, but compare to a proper tank... amen..

Anyway, if you compare a MNK's damage on slime, and a DRK's damage on slime, you are just trying to make it unfair... MNKs are said to be good after 60+, because we fight skeletons for sometimes, which is the only thing MNK is good at MNK is the only job with A on blunt-element attack, so it's reasonable to say MNK is a good DD when you are fighting skeleton, but as I know, most players ignore most of the sentence, and so, the saying 'MNK is good DD against skeletons' slowly turned into 'MNK is good DD'... chinese whisper game, right? ^^

the only problem with that is...
MNK IS a good DD, it's just quite a lot better vs. skeletons

[CarbonFibre]

Originally posted by Cali
MNK is the only job with A on blunt-element attack

MNK is the only damage dealing job that has an A on blunt-element attack. Paladin has an A in club and staff.

[lionx]

Originally posted by bonovoxpsu
wow. red mage in DEAD LAST. tsk tsk. NOT ONE VOTE?!?!

whm and brd beat us. how sad...

Hexa Strike pwnz j00! O.ov

[sudo]

lol what is up with that? rdm still has zero votes. I mean come on, the brd got more damage??? lol


I voted for bst just because I am one and I know that over the course of a fight for just putting up numbers, my IT++ lv 85 mob pet on bst 2hr boost and myself in full hitting gear will outdamge any other melee on the field easily.

I mean come on, it's 2 guys hitting vs one. And if we're just trying to put up awesome numbers, then I'm positive that a lv 85 double strengthed mob can hit harder than a lv 75 player even with great gear. 10 lvs of difference here folks. And it's me AND my pet.