Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Introducing the BG-Wiki

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Feba
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    Sev: learn to read please.

    Susurs: of course. Minor disagreements with things that have nothing to do with the actual content gogo. I dislike that some of the founding fathers had slaves. Fuck the US and your slave owning founders. I'm gonna go start my own country, with drugs and hookers.

    In fact, forget the country.

    Leave a comment:


  • Armando
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    DOES NOBODY ELSE SEE THIS AS A PROBLEM?
    I do, but regardless of who's wrong or right in the FFXIclopedia fiasco, the fact is that some people no longer want to be associated with FFXIclopedia under any circumstances. A second Wiki was probably an inevitability even if the BG dudes hadn't been planning this for a while.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mhurron
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    Originally posted by SevIfrit View Post
    God damn it people, only armando gets it.
    YOU ANNOUNCE A WIKI WHEN IT LAUNCHES DUE TO THE FACT IT IS UPDATED BY THE COMMUNITY.
    Whooooosh at anyone who says needs more info.
    Unless you make a big deal about it before hand, state that your working on it and when its available it's going to be awesome.

    In which case if you release it to the general public before it has articles, well, some people are going to be really underwhelmed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Susurrus
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    I know this post will probably get overlooked among the spam of useless argument threads, but...

    Here is my opinion on why a new Wiki is a bad idea.

    ffxiclopedia was a central location for everyone to be able to update. Now those updates are SPLIT. Now neither can be the single click resource, have to check TWO sites now.

    One location to find something > Two.

    DOES NOBODY ELSE SEE THIS AS A PROBLEM?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sevv
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    God damn it people, only armando gets it.

    YOU ANNOUNCE A WIKI WHEN IT LAUNCHES DUE TO THE FACT IT IS UPDATED BY THE COMMUNITY.


    Whooooosh at anyone who says needs more info.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kailea
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    Originally posted by Feba View Post
    Who the hell posts a database site as a resource when it doesn't even have a page for Ronfaure?

    oooohhh pppffff if I had not started it, someone else would have.

    Leave a comment:


  • Feba
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    In all fairness, being a Wiki, it makes sense to announce it as soon as it's launched so all possible contributors can get to doing their contributing as early as possible.
    Exactly, but then he's not posting a thread on a resource, he's asking for help. And anyone asking for help to do something that's already been done should deal with the statements that come with that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kailea
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    Originally posted by Legal Fish View Post
    Oh and can a mod lock this please. I'll make another thread when the history page makes more progress.
    Just a little fun: a thread wouldn't get this derailed on BG unless it was made to get derailed like a "Drama" thread. But a resource thread? Nope. Maybe you guys haven't been noticing it, but the quality of FFXIonline has been dropping quite a bit. I used to refer everyone new to these boards, but things have changed. You got Feba(and his circle of asskissers), who posts more than anyone and doesn't even play the god damn game and I can't recall the last time I've heard good advice given. Kaelia is like an abortion gone wrong and has somehow survived to live to this day, giving us her pay back of being picked on highschool(for being a weeaboo furry probably). Don't get me started on the few posters who refuse to acknowledge they are wrong and go around with this false aura of superiority and prejudice. For all the elitism BG is accused of, a new player would be probably get much more help from that website using the "Newbie Boards".
    Let's have less shitfests and less hypocritical bashing of other websites. Maybe the quality can go up.

    lock this one so you can start another one, and have peopel post in ot? how about no -.-

    I will at least give BG-wiki a chance... but good god, finish more of the database core info, before making any more "announcements"

    Feba is right about what was sold, it could have been handled better.....

    it wasn't people are acting like FFXI-wiki has cooties, even I have acted out a bit -.-

    Everyone grow up, and stop acting like children (self included)

    another Wiki, honestly is pointless, we already have a better one with all updated into.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sevv
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    Needless to say I still find it funny many of the people who said they don't like BG in previous threads because things get derailed, helped derail this thread. AFK back to working on ninja guide and nm pages for bg wiki.

    Leave a comment:


  • Murphie
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    If we could have a new thread with a "please don't post your retarded diatribe" rule, that'd be nifty.

    But honestly, there isn't much to discuss at this point. We know the Wiki is up now, and if we wan to contribute (or use it) we can.

    Leave a comment:


  • Armando
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    In all fairness, being a Wiki, it makes sense to announce it as soon as it's launched so all possible contributors can get to doing their contributing as early as possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aksannyi
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    Well the thread started off just fine, and someone came in and started the drama. That's all it takes, just one post. After the drama had passed and all was (relatively) all right with the world again, we commenced with the lulz.

    True, it's a bit extreme, but if a message board isn't for information, flamebait, debate, making up, and lulz, then I don't know what it's for.

    Leave a comment:


  • Feba
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    Who the hell posts a database site as a resource when it doesn't even have a page for Ronfaure?

    Leave a comment:


  • Legal Fish
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    Oh and can a mod lock this please. I'll make another thread when the history page makes more progress.

    Just a little fun: a thread wouldn't get this derailed on BG unless it was made to get derailed like a "Drama" thread. But a resource thread? Nope. Maybe you guys haven't been noticing it, but the quality of FFXIonline has been dropping quite a bit. I used to refer everyone new to these boards, but things have changed. You got Feba(and his circle of asskissers), who posts more than anyone and doesn't even play the god damn game and I can't recall the last time I've heard good advice given. Kaelia is like an abortion gone wrong and has somehow survived to live to this day, giving us her pay back of being picked on highschool(for being a weeaboo furry probably). Don't get me started on the few posters who refuse to acknowledge they are wrong and go around with this false aura of superiority and prejudice. For all the elitism BG is accused of, a new player would be probably get much more help from that website using the "Newbie Boards".

    Let's have less shitfests and less hypocritical bashing of other websites. Maybe the quality can go up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Callisto
    replied
    Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

    Originally posted by Feba View Post
    Which was what the "if it paid well" was for.


    I've looked into this stuff before. If I wanted to RMT, I have a good idea of what game I'd play and how I'd do it.
    It definitely wouldn't be FFXI, I can barely make enough gil to attend Limbus twice a week, let alone enough to sell for rent money!
    ------------------------------------------
    Originally posted by Legal Fish View Post
    What the hell is wrong with you people?

    Why is this 8 pages in less than 12 hours?
    You obviously don't know how boring working in Finance is.

    And there were lolcats, so it's ok.
    Last edited by Callisto; 09-24-2007, 01:02 PM. Reason: Autobot Doublestuffs

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X