Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Magic: The Gathering

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Taskmage
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    I found this second place deck list from GP Toronto to be enchanting:
    Sam Pardee's Melirapod
    It's a Birthing Pod deck, so there's that, but there's also this delicious synergy between Melira, Sylvok Outcast and persist creatures that goes full on combo when you add a sacrifice engine like the aforementioned pod or Viscera Seer, which allows you to gain infinite life with Finks and deal infinite damage with Redcap while stacking your deck for good measure. And of course there's always plan B of kicking teeth in with some big guys you just tutored up with the pod. Clever, and looks like a lot of fun.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yellow Mage
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    I already have a Modern tribal deck. The Mono-White one, that uses Lapse of Certainty.

    Also, I think I've finally made a fun WU deck, though it doesn't do half the things I wanted it to initially, thanks to the process of cutting it down to 60 cards. Who'd think I'd have to cut so much from a Standard pool of cards?

    Anyway, somebody log on and play me! :D

    Leave a comment:


  • Malacite
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    Depending if it's standard or not, Goblins would have to be banned rofl.

    Leave a comment:


  • Firewind
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    I did want to organise a little "Tribal War" thing between our group. Basically one person picks a tribe and makes a deck around it.

    Then I realised just how many tribes we would actually have to ban to make things not retarded XD

    Leave a comment:


  • Malacite
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    I'm torn on that, because on the one hand I miss playing Goblins, but I also really, really like how well Human decks work right now.

    Frontline Medic is just going to break all kinds of aggro decks. Selesnya did NOT need that guy rofl...

    Leave a comment:


  • Firewind
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    I'm hoping Boros gets more Goblin cards. I do love Boros Themed Goblin Decks even if traditional Goblin decks, or going for an Izzet Theme are better choices.

    Leave a comment:


  • Taskmage
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    Ok, I thought you might have been pretending to not get it to force me to explain it to spoil the joke and make me look silly. So consider this battle of wits a draw due to insufficient material.

    Leave a comment:


  • Malacite
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    Eh sorry, sarcasm is sometimes hard to pick up on via text-only. Plus as I said, I'm kinda dealing with Hell atm regarding my PC so yeah....


    New Boros medic is f'ing crazy. 3/3 for 2W Battalion makes your critters indestructible for the turn. Can also sac him to counter any X spell unless opponent pays 3 - bai bai Bonfire/Entreat/Sphinx


    T1: Champion of the Parish
    T2: Lightning Mauler, Swing for 2
    T3: Cleric, Bond with Mauler, Swing for 8
    T4: Lots of ways to win the game right there... Thalia + Cloudshift, Silverblade Paladin + Cloudshift, Restoration Angel, Thatcher's Revolt, the new aggro goblin (though I'd rather not run him 'cause prefer humans) Hellrider...


    This guy is nasty. Boros may yet have a chance of seeing constructed play.

    Leave a comment:


  • Firewind
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    There is a reason why that Hive Mind deck is so popular though. Any game involving that is always a hilarious one. And it is just a generally fun card to see in play because literally ANYTHING can happen. need I remind you of the Catsplosion?

    Also this card is 1 CMC less than Vraska, has more use in multiplayer, and is actually a lot harder to remove than a Planeswalker due to Enchantment hate being less common in Multiplayer due to most only being a one shot deal:

    Leave a comment:


  • Taskmage
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    Fortunately, the Elocutors are only an alternate win-con for that deck, which also contains the Fencing Aces, Invisible Stalkers, Ethereal Armor, and Curiosity. The enchantments-as-removal do double synergy with the Sphere of Safety and Ethereal Armor. I consider that to be a pretty fun and effective UW deck. The deck with Conjured Currency and Hive Mind (with all the hexproof guys and Leyline of Sanctity) is also UW. Actually, those are probably my two funnest decks.

    (Look at me opening Cockatrice for the first time in probably a month.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Firewind
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    That and TM actually did use the exact same deck you're describing in Multiplayer and he can tell you exactly how long he lasted when he played the Elocutors. Detention Sphere and O-Ring are pretty shit in Multiplayer since it is just a one shot deal, and freeing up an O-Ringed creature is a good way to gain an ally if you have Enchantment hate in your deck. Sure you can O-Ring a player's flyer but what about the other players in the game? They aren't going to let you sit there racking up the counters. Plus politics will screw you over for being the control guy if you aren't careful. Ask Cid how much hate he gets for playing his Black "Wipe the Board every turn for the evulz" deck and how long he lasts is he starts playing stuff too quickly.

    Azorius is a bad choice for control in Multiplayer too. Black or Red, probably White tends to be what you want to do for due to them having far more global effects and cards that aren't just restricted to a single creature.

    That and control decks tend to piss off the entire table and make games unfun to play if you use the decks too often. I think everyone has seen my Monoblack Pestilence deck for Multiplayer, and how the presence of that deck draws so much hate purely so people don't have to deal with it. Funnily enough my G/B Elf Deck for MP draws a ton of hate too even though I deliberately made it "unridiculous" so people can actually have fun playing against it.

    Seriously, not enough people consider making decks interesting of fun to play against in Multiplayer, probably the most casual format of magic out there. When I see the decklistings online of Spike players, half the time I think "And this guy doesn't get punched in the face every time he plays this deck?". Everyone in the group has a deck that is very competitive but also gets torn apart by everyone else very quickly for that very reason.
    Last edited by Firewind; 01-09-2013, 04:05 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Taskmage
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    It was a pun ... about your deck with two prominent spheres ... sounding like balls.

    ... Am I being trolled? <_<

    Leave a comment:


  • Firewind
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    Problem with going for Vraska's Ultimate in multiplayer: It's painting a huge "Kill me now" target on your head and it is surprisingly easy to remove given the number of removal/bounce cards in the game that say "Non-land permanent". Plus it's not as if people are going to sit there and let her build counters. If you're gunning for the ultimate you bet people will be willing to bite the bullet and agree with each other to sacrifice a creature each to be rid of her.

    The Deathtouch ability is actually the reason why you would play her in multiplayer for the reasons that TM said above. That said, it is 5 CMC to remove what? 2? 3 creatures? Wrath of God is 4CMC and wipes the board.

    I'm saying she's a bad card but I'm with TM when saying in Multiplayer, it is only really the deathtouch ability you want but you cn get the exact same effect from Basilisk Collars (which are MUCH more devastating in Multiplayer), and multiplayer decks don't always pack dedicated Artifact removal purely due to most of them only being a one shot deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Malacite
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    What's wrong with them?

    One acts as a 2ndary O-Ring that can hit multiple copies (and also wipe out tokens permanently I think?) and the other basically just stops you from ever attacking me because I run so many annoying enchantment anyway that by the time it hits the field, your cost to attack is astronomical.

    Leave a comment:


  • Taskmage
    replied
    Re: Magic: The Gathering

    I was just commenting on your spheres.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X