This morning my PC suddenly froze, screen got bugged (not the famous blue screen, though), and after I rebooted it, it beeped at the POST and didn't boot. After some trouble-shooting, it was 1 of 2 RAM sticks that somehow suddenly died (another one seems ok for now, but maybe it got damaged, too). While I need to replace RAM anyways, there's this one thing I'm considering now; upgrade to AM2 or not.
My PC is a socket 939 Athlon based, and naturally it uses DDR. While DDR RAM is still widely available, it's obvious that it's fading away as we speak, w/ both Intel and AMD now supporting DDR2. And w/ AMD's AM2 socket platform now being the mainstream for Athlon based systems, I'm assuming that it'll fade away faster than I thought.
I never used DDR2-based systems, so I don't know how much overall performace increase can be expected by moving to AM2 and DDR2, or in other words, whether the performance gain is something noticeable or not. From my understanding the only difference between 939 and AM2 are DDR2 support and Virtualization technology which is something I don't need.
Now, my options are as follows;
1. Just replace RAM for now, and wait for at least Vista or maybe DirectX 10, and see if upgrade is needed at that point. (Obviously, the cheapest option.)
2. Go AM2 and DDR2 now, if DDR2 provides me w/ noticeably greater performance. (Need to buy CPU, RAM, and mobo for this. And many AM2 mobo claim to be "Vista ready" while those of 939 don't.)
3. Am I nuts to go for AMD? Get Core 2 Duo, arguably the hottest CPU on the market now. (Costs more than the option 2.)
Which one do you think is the best action to take? Any input on this is greatly appreciated. And to help you better understand my current circumstance, here's some info;
My PC
CPU: Athlon 64 X2 3800+, socket 939, Manchester
RAM: 2* 512MB DDR PC3200 (one dead
Mobo: ASUS A8N-SLI (nForce4 SLI, not 16x, but not planning to go SLI at this point)
VGA: RADEON X700 Pro, PCI-e
OS: Windows XP MCE 2005 w/ Rollup 2
Usage
Games: FFXI only. No other PC games.
Multi-task: Occasionaly. The heaviest usage would be Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Flash, IE, E-mail, WMP playing MP3 files all at once.
CPU-hungry tasks: Do some video encoding from time to time, but not so often. Set the task batch and let it do the job while I'm asleep. Never do it while I'm awake.
Misc
RAM price: DDR PC3200 and DDR2 PC5300 RAMs of the same capacity are about the same in price in Japan. DDR2 PC6400 ones cost about US$5-10 more per stick.
Budget: I will upgrade at some point in the path anyways, so not concerned much about how much they cost. It's a question of timing, whether go for it now or wait till something major happens later.
Old components: If I go w/ upgrade, I'll sell them at auctions or to the used PC stores (widely available in Japan) in order to save as much bucks as possible.
Again, thanks for your inputs in advance.
My PC is a socket 939 Athlon based, and naturally it uses DDR. While DDR RAM is still widely available, it's obvious that it's fading away as we speak, w/ both Intel and AMD now supporting DDR2. And w/ AMD's AM2 socket platform now being the mainstream for Athlon based systems, I'm assuming that it'll fade away faster than I thought.
I never used DDR2-based systems, so I don't know how much overall performace increase can be expected by moving to AM2 and DDR2, or in other words, whether the performance gain is something noticeable or not. From my understanding the only difference between 939 and AM2 are DDR2 support and Virtualization technology which is something I don't need.
Now, my options are as follows;
1. Just replace RAM for now, and wait for at least Vista or maybe DirectX 10, and see if upgrade is needed at that point. (Obviously, the cheapest option.)
2. Go AM2 and DDR2 now, if DDR2 provides me w/ noticeably greater performance. (Need to buy CPU, RAM, and mobo for this. And many AM2 mobo claim to be "Vista ready" while those of 939 don't.)
3. Am I nuts to go for AMD? Get Core 2 Duo, arguably the hottest CPU on the market now. (Costs more than the option 2.)
Which one do you think is the best action to take? Any input on this is greatly appreciated. And to help you better understand my current circumstance, here's some info;
My PC
CPU: Athlon 64 X2 3800+, socket 939, Manchester
RAM: 2* 512MB DDR PC3200 (one dead

Mobo: ASUS A8N-SLI (nForce4 SLI, not 16x, but not planning to go SLI at this point)
VGA: RADEON X700 Pro, PCI-e
OS: Windows XP MCE 2005 w/ Rollup 2
Usage
Games: FFXI only. No other PC games.
Multi-task: Occasionaly. The heaviest usage would be Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Flash, IE, E-mail, WMP playing MP3 files all at once.
CPU-hungry tasks: Do some video encoding from time to time, but not so often. Set the task batch and let it do the job while I'm asleep. Never do it while I'm awake.
Misc
RAM price: DDR PC3200 and DDR2 PC5300 RAMs of the same capacity are about the same in price in Japan. DDR2 PC6400 ones cost about US$5-10 more per stick.
Budget: I will upgrade at some point in the path anyways, so not concerned much about how much they cost. It's a question of timing, whether go for it now or wait till something major happens later.
Old components: If I go w/ upgrade, I'll sell them at auctions or to the used PC stores (widely available in Japan) in order to save as much bucks as possible.
Again, thanks for your inputs in advance.





Finding a comparable stick is easy, but since this is for dual-channel configuration, I'd rather pick 2 of the same manufacture, idealy of the same lot.
Comment