anyone who says pls is clearly NOT being polite, so why bother typing anything?
it would seem to me that WAR would be a waste of time because you are not a tank as a dragoon. You simply aren't
it would seem to me that WAR would be a waste of time because you are not a tank as a dragoon. You simply aren't
hi
do you even think before you post, or do you just pull random statements out of your arse? (<====| HI I AM BEING IMPOLITE OMG!~@~~)
what the hell makes you think warrior sub makes anyone a tank?
do you even know what abilities you get out of subbing warrior?
heres a clue
1) double attack
2) Berserk (+25% to your attk owns)
3) +1 attk up boost
4) +1 def up boost
5) Defensive
hi out of 5 abilities .... only 2 have anything to do with tanking
you sir have no clue about what you are talking about
but here is a little bit of education for you
our good friends at merriam webster have this to say:-
Main Entry: vi·a·ble
Pronunciation: 'vI-&-b&l
Function: adjective
Etymology: French, from Middle French, from vie life, from Latin vita -- more at VITAL
1 : capable of living; especially : capable of surviving outside the mother's womb without artificial support <the normal human fetus is usually viable by the end of the seventh month>
2 : capable of growing or developing <viable seeds> <viable eggs>
3 a : capable of working, functioning, or developing adequately <viable alternatives> b : capable of existence and development as an independent unit <the colony is now a viable state> c (1) : having a reasonable chance of succeeding <a viable candidate> (2) : financially sustainable <a viable enterprise>
now lets define adequately
Main Entry: ad·e·quate
Pronunciation: -kw&t
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin adaequatus, past participle of adaequare to make equal, from ad- + aequare to equal -- more at EQUABLE
1 : sufficient for a specific requirement <adequate taxation of goods>; also : barely sufficient or satisfactory <her first performance was merely adequate>
2 : lawfully and reasonably sufficient
synonym see SUFFICIENT
In the context of this discussion adequately means that your sub should be at least on par with the dominant archetypes. Almost all your suggestions dont even hold a candle to the dominant archetypes and so you sir are wasting not only your own time but the time off all those whom you misguidedly seek to enlighten
Stop confusing VIABLE with POSSIBLE. Be any damn sub you want just dont lie to yourself that its anywhere close to a viable alternative because as i have said earlier ppl with far far far more experience and analytical skill have already exhausted all the options long before you even became a dragoon.
(Does the ranger's accuracy bonus' affect physical attacks or just ranged attacks?)
EDIT yes i know i left out provoke , but the argument still stands ... if you ever have to use it then your tank has serious issues
Comment