After reading we would only get 15.5% TP back from Guillotine I was extremely upset seeing im lvl 52 and was looking forward to Guillotine but I looked at it more indepth and I actually think its a good thing.
1) Dragoons can't out power us anymore. No more penta spam even if they sub samurai. Square realized the #1 melee damage dealer (Us ^.^) was being beat by penta spam. With the TP nerf we once again move to the top.
2) Samurais are once again the kings of TP. With multi hit weapons skills giving back 50-60% TP sam's were having hard times keeping up most of the time. Now we'll be the ones playing catch-up, like it should be.
3) Instead of spam, Skill Chains will play an even more important in defeating your enemy rather than hitting a button over and over. Lots of strategy involved hitting a button over and over /sarcasm.
4) All the babies quitting because they cant deal with it get me more invites
5) Guillotine still has draw dropping damage
1) Dragoons can't out power us anymore. No more penta spam even if they sub samurai. Square realized the #1 melee damage dealer (Us ^.^) was being beat by penta spam. With the TP nerf we once again move to the top.
2) Samurais are once again the kings of TP. With multi hit weapons skills giving back 50-60% TP sam's were having hard times keeping up most of the time. Now we'll be the ones playing catch-up, like it should be.
3) Instead of spam, Skill Chains will play an even more important in defeating your enemy rather than hitting a button over and over. Lots of strategy involved hitting a button over and over /sarcasm.
4) All the babies quitting because they cant deal with it get me more invites
5) Guillotine still has draw dropping damage



), I think whenever people QUIT becuase of ONE alteration in their class is evidence enough that it needed to be changed, and Downgrade can be a good thing, especially when something is abused and other tactics are exluded for it. Im assuming this is one of the biggest reasons they changed it, to see some fludity in tactics and diversivness. 
Comment