I made a post about how I thought Hume's would make good Mages, but lately I've been noticing a lot of stuff about Mithra. Like, "Taru are the best but Mithra are second." and "They're right up there with Mithra" (referring to Humes). My question is, What am I missing? It seems to me that Humes have better stats for mage than Mithra do. The have equal INT but they have more VIT which would help in taking a hit when they need to and more MIND which helps with white mage right? Though I haven't played the game yet so I'm working off of statistics.
If any of you think or know one way or the other as to which is better please tell me. Like if the Mithra's agility and dexterity help in some way for mage. Because if they don't, then Hume's would have to inhernetly be better mages than Mithra as far as I can tell, since those are the only stats that Mithra have above Hume.
I've just heard a lot of stuff about Mithra being the best mages next to Taru and if agility and dexterity don't help with mage, then this must not be true.
If any of you think or know one way or the other as to which is better please tell me. Like if the Mithra's agility and dexterity help in some way for mage. Because if they don't, then Hume's would have to inhernetly be better mages than Mithra as far as I can tell, since those are the only stats that Mithra have above Hume.
I've just heard a lot of stuff about Mithra being the best mages next to Taru and if agility and dexterity don't help with mage, then this must not be true.


Comment