If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Becauce XIV demands much more to produce less in terms of visual quality than a game with a more standard engine? Plus SE's implementations tend to be ... iconoclastic? It's entirely possible to have a rig that runs XI like crap, for example, while running more advanced applications beautifully.
This. Don't really know if this is the case for XIV but I remember how XI's crappy weather effects would totally demolish your smooth framerate and they didn't even look that good.
Anyone can write code that consumes a lot of resources, the real trick is getting good mileage out of the resources you consume.
Becauce XIV demands much more to produce less in terms of visual quality than a game with a more standard engine? Plus SE's implementations tend to be ... iconoclastic? It's entirely possible to have a rig that runs XI like crap, for example, while running more advanced applications beautifully.
Or you could play it at medium settings? I mean, I like pretty pictures as much as the next guy but all that crap really only matters to me on the first day when I'm playing with the settings and thereafter whenever I post a screenshot. During the action who really gives a damn? When you get your next PC and have that video card for cheap, then play at maxed settings.
I only have a GTX 465, and that barely runs XIV at an OK pace.
I can wait and enjoy the PS3 version until I get my next rig.
Or you could play it at medium settings? I mean, I like pretty pictures as much as the next guy but all that crap really only matters to me on the first day when I'm playing with the settings and thereafter whenever I post a screenshot. During the action who really gives a damn? When you get your next PC and have that video card for cheap, then play at maxed settings.
[QUOTEGiven the proximity of the Battlefield 3 launch, the beta system requirements shouldn't differ much (if at all) from the final game. Don't throw out your GTX 560 between now and October!
Minimum System Requirements
OS: Windows Vista (Service Pack 2) 32-bit Processor: 2 GHz Dual Core (Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz or Athlon X2 2.7 GHz) Memory: 2 GB Hard Drive: 20 GB Graphics Card (AMD): DirectX 10.1 Compatible with 512 MB RAM (ATI Radeon 3000, 4000, 5000 or 6000 SERIES, with ATI RADEON 3870 or higher performance) Graphics Card (Nvidia): DirectX 10.0 compatible with 512 MB RAM (Nvidia Geforce 8, 9, 200, 300, 400 or 500 series with Nvidia Geforce 8800 GT or higher performance) Sound Card: DirectX compatible
Keyboard and Mouse
DVD-ROM Drive
Recommended System Requirements
OS: Windows 7 64-bit Processor: Quad-core CPU Memory: 4 GB Hard Drive: 20 GB Graphics Card: DirectX 11 compatible with 1024 MB RAM (Nvidia Geforce GTX 560 or ATI Radeon 6950) Sound Card: DirectX compatible
Keyboard and Mouse
DVD-ROM Drive ][/QUOTE]
Also, the top comment confirms my fears and validates my decision to get the PS3 version;
Leave a comment: