| |||||
| | #1 |
| Wash my hands of this mess... | Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x%
Ok well I was looking over the newer gear and with the iron ram set it possible to get up to +34 as a pld. But on the other side of the spectrum Magic damage taken -30% is the max the max not including the aegis. Now I am not expecting someone to go full magic defense against most HNM and events because most things still hit like trucks even when they are spell casters. But I was wondering is Magic def. bonus only better then magic damage taken when both are low quanity such as magic def bonus +5 and magic damage take -5% or is magic def bonus capable of standing up at high quanity? I know with the aegis that is a wooping -55% to damage which I can see saving you from one shot of any spell besides AVs and PMs but can that defense drop spells down to reasonable damage of big spells like AMs as well or is it a garbage stat?. I can't seem to find any testing on magic defenses besides stats which is mostly used to determine spell damage from a player to a mob so there is no set equation for 1 def is damage - X. For that same fact I can't seem to find it for elemental resist either does anyone know a link or have any theories?
|
| | |
| | #2 |
| 2300 AD is pretty screwed up Iron Emblem of Service Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 5,110 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 707
Thanked 1,631x in 906 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x%
Organize/separate your sentences/thoughts/questions better. It's hard to follow. Magic Damage Taken -X% works a straight multiplier. It goes without saying that Magic Damage Taken -13% means you take 13% less damage from any spell; or looking at it in a different way, you take 87% of the spell's full damage instead of 100%. Bear in mind that Shell spells give -MDT, despite the description saying the spell increases magic defense. SE fails at descriptions that way. Magic Defense Bonus, on the other hand, works as a divisor. MDB+17 means that you take 1/1.17 = 0.8547 = 85.47% of the spell's full damage. In other words, the spell's damage is reduced by 14.53%. Because it works as a divisor, the damage is always reduced by an amount smaller than the MDB number (e.g. in this case damage was only reduced 14.53% instead of 17%.) As the amount of MDB goes up, the losses become greater. For example, having 50 MDB results in spell damage being reduced by only 33.33%. At very low quantities MDB is almost equivalent to -MDT, but as you get more of it, it starts to lose worth. Besides that, in practice, the cap on Magic Damage Taken -X% is 23% because the cap is 50%, but Shell spells count as -MDT and fully merited Shellra V is 27%. Also, MDB does not work on every kind of magic damage. It won't guard against Skillchain damage, Breath attacks, or just about any other magic of damage that isn't affected by Magic Attack Bonus to begin with. Magic Damage Taken -X% is pretty universal. Elemental Resistance does not have anything to do with the damage calculations, it simply increases your chances of resisting magic of that element. It's very likely that elemental resistance is the opposite stat to magic skills and magic accuracy, but how they're checked against each other to determine the probabilities is unclear.
__________________ Last edited by Armando; 07-30-2009 at 06:36 AM. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Crime Solving Rank 11 Paladin! Steelknight Emblem Join Date: May 2006 Location: None of your damn business
Posts: 5,839 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 1,375
Thanked 524x in 365 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x% Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Wash my hands of this mess... | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x%
Thank you sorry for the unclear question. So if building an anti magic swap magic damage taken would be the better choice plus coral earrings are really good in general. Thank you again Armando.
|
| | |
| | #5 | ||
| 2300 AD is pretty screwed up Iron Emblem of Service Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 5,110 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 707
Thanked 1,631x in 906 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x% Quote:
Quote:
__________________ | ||
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Veteran Member Allied Ribbon of Glory | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x% Quote:
The minimum Shell you can *rely* on having is Shell III, because you can cast it yourself. (Actually, in a sufficiently dispel-spammy fight you can't even rely on that staying up.) Shell III is about 19%, so up to 31% of -MDT gear could be useful in situations where you don't have a RDM, SCH, or WHM at all (e.g. soloing and Campaign). Usually you have at least one of those, so you probably have Shell IV, which gets you to 21%, so up to 29% of gear would be useful. Level 1 Shellra V (which seems to be what most WHMs have if they have it at all) is 24%, so up to 26% of gear would be useful. Shining Ruby, if it also counts as -MDT and not MDB, is another 10% which stacks with spells of the Shell family. For sufficiently large attacks that could be very worth it, considering it's cheaper than Cure III and lasts for 3 minutes. (And reduces physical damage too.)
__________________ Defeated: Maat, Divine Might, Fenrir, Kirin, Cactrot Rapido, Xolotl, Diabolos Prime, Kurrea, 9/10 Dynamis Bosses (missing Tav), Promathia, Proto-Ultima, Proto-Omega, 4 Jailers, Apocalypse Nigh, 6/6 Nyzul Bosses RDM75, PLD75, DRG75, COR75, SCH61 Windurst Rank 10, Bastok Rank 10, San D'Oria Rank 9, ZMs & PMs Complete, AUMs Complete, Captain, Nyzul Floor 100 (5 Weapons, 3 WS), Moonlight Medal, WotG Mission 15, 1/3 Addons Complete | |
| | |
| The following user says "Thank You" to Karinya for above post: | Armando (07-30-2009) |
| | #7 | |
| Crime Solving Rank 11 Paladin! Steelknight Emblem Join Date: May 2006 Location: None of your damn business
Posts: 5,839 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 1,375
Thanked 524x in 365 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x% Quote:
really now? The way you worded it though it was kinda vague, and sounded like you were implying that MDB won't help you if you're already capped on damage reduction (to which I've seen plenty that indicates to the contrary) Hurray for conflicting information! >,< ---------- Post added at 04:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:08 PM ---------- What about Magus Roll? Or is that just a waste of Phantom Roll potential regardless? According to the Wiki with a BLU in the PT it maxes out at a whopping +33 on an XI... that *has* to have an impact. | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| 2300 AD is pretty screwed up Iron Emblem of Service Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 5,110 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 707
Thanked 1,631x in 906 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x%
I don't know of any situation where Magus Roll comes in handy over a different roll outside of ACP11. But I don't do endgame so I'm most certainly not the person to ask. It's certainly potent enough to be effective, but having it compete with other rolls for a slot means it's gotta be a situation where you're exposed to a constant stream of painful magic damage (ACP11), or one big unavoidable magic attack that you want to reduce to sub-lethal levels of damage (could be used to try to prevent a OHKO during ToAU44, actually.)
__________________ |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Tamarsamar - 赤魔騎士 Bronze Star Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,647 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 3,445
Thanked 546x in 349 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x%
__________________ Best. Augmented. Red Mage. Earring. Ever. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Sticky Paws Sterling Star Join Date: May 2006 Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,201 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 256
Thanked 678x in 434 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x%
If you have a COR in tank party, it's pretty much guaranteed Evoker's Roll will used. (Even with a RDM for Refresh, a good PLD can always find use for more MP, and who doesn't love double March if there's a BRD?) Magus Roll or Hunter's Roll (for Atonement PLD) is probably the single best use for the second roll for the PLD/NIN's up front, IMO. Though, in many situations, the alliance may prefer to swap the COR to melee party for two melee rolls, and have the COR do only Evoker's for tank party.
__________________ “I’m in pain, but I’m happy.” “It hurts, but I can smile.” “That’s why I can tell you from the depths of my being…” |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Crime Solving Rank 11 Paladin! Steelknight Emblem Join Date: May 2006 Location: None of your damn business
Posts: 5,839 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 1,375
Thanked 524x in 365 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x%
>.> suppose you have a shell with a lot of COR so you can rotate them the way you rotate BRD? O.o speaking of which what's the max number of rolls you can have active anyway? |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Now With More Y! Allied Ribbon of Glory Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 2,377 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 198
Thanked 603x in 351 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x% Quote:
Barring Aegis, I've always stuck with the way to go being to gear for 25%~ MDT- first, overshooting capped Shell V a bit gives some wiggle room for individual WHMs, and hell half the time I'm lucky to get Shell IV anyways. From there stack on MDB. I do miss out on a chunk of potential MDB since I don't like swapping in Iron Ram Lance and killing my Atonement/Chivalry TP, but I pull off -24% with +10MDB and really haven't had any troubles with getting walloped magically that I can recall.
__________________ Callysto of RamuhCaithsith - 75 RDM / BRD / COR / PLD / WAR / SCH Formerly Callisto of Ramuh. RDM Guide( Updated July '09!) | COR Guide | FFXIAH Item Sets & Junk | |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Sticky Paws Sterling Star Join Date: May 2006 Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,201 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 256
Thanked 678x in 434 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x% Quote:
Regardless, taking less damage isn't a bad thing--that roll has its uses.
__________________ “I’m in pain, but I’m happy.” “It hurts, but I can smile.” “That’s why I can tell you from the depths of my being…” | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Nekoai Nanashi Allied Ribbon of Glory Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Dumfries, Virgina
Posts: 2,260 Style: Dark Theme V6 Thanks: 1,260
Thanked 212x in 164 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x% Callisto and Armando: This is a relative build I can pull off with what I have at the moment; FFXIGEAR.com Should I either go for -dmt or +mdb instead of +light in the slots that have them?
|
| | |
| | #15 |
| Sticky Paws Sterling Star Join Date: May 2006 Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,201 Style: Light Theme V7 Thanks: 256
Thanked 678x in 434 Posts
My Mood: | Re: Magic Def. Bonus vs Magic damage taken -x%
I doubt Light resist is worth bothering with...
__________________ “I’m in pain, but I’m happy.” “It hurts, but I can smile.” “That’s why I can tell you from the depths of my being…” |
| | |
![]() |
| Tags |
| bonus, damage, def, magic, x% |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |