06-12-2008, 05:22 AM | #47 (permalink) | | Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Kinston, NC Posts: 121 Style: Light - Version 6 My Mood: Thanks: 28 Thanked 10x in 8 Posts Gil: 11,596 Bank: 17,137 Total Gil: 28,733 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer And yes that is a great analogy. You see someone was saying that the new feature is a waste of time and gives a false since of security. But it depends on how u look at it.
In your analogy the user was with some1 with syplis, well guess what, now the user has it too. So it doesn’t matter where he goes or what he does, the user’s pc is still compromised regardless if they know what sites were “fixed” or what not.
So SE knows it’s a keylogger, and since no one can figure out how to remove the code/program/etc, they are doing the most logical thing, allowing users to use an on screen keyboard, where a keylogger can’t get the password.
Now since they think they “know” how it all began with Real player, flash, w/ever, they figure the computer might be safe from “NEW” programs using the same method they used to infect with the “Old” Program.
Now as from them websites provided about known issues etc., there was always at least 2-4 weeks where the “ability to be compromised” is unknown. Just cause they find it after it’s been out in the public for a month, and took them a month to make patch, doesn’t mean the patch is going to fix what the computer might have infected with. The damage has been done. It takes time for them to know something’s wrong, then it’s going to take time for them to fix it. All that time, unless it’s emailed or televised, no one is going to know something’s wrong, until its way too late. So, is it still the User’s fault he was hacked? Even when ppl didn’t know, at the time even Real Player didn’t know, what the problem was?
Now the above statement is an analogy for the most part, but it can and will happen. How long with that version of Real Player out before ppl started to figure out something was wrong. Even SE didn’t believe the users when they started reporting something was wrong.
______________________________
Hmmm... let's just all agree it's Bill Gats's Fault and be done with it lol.  Last edited by Phanex : 06-12-2008 at 05:38 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 06-12-2008, 05:40 AM | #48 (permalink) | | Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Winston,GA Posts: 655 Style: Light - Version 6 My Mood: Thanks: 42 Thanked 23x in 21 Posts Gil: 6,784 Bank: 12,253 Total Gil: 19,038 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer hey Feba is the Troll and every message board has one. I find it best to ignore such people 80% of the time...
BTW: My sister's friend got hacked...and it was a shared account too! (and the RMTs deleted one of the characters!) I'm glad SE finally did something! | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 06-12-2008, 06:38 AM | #49 (permalink) | | Senior Veteran Oracle of Knowledge Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 4,618 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 116 Thanked 1,434x in 870 Posts Gil: 2,498 Bank: 333,825 Total Gil: 336,323 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer Originally Posted by Phanex | And yes that is a great analogy. You see someone was saying that the new feature is a waste of time and gives a false since of security. But it depends on how u look at it.
In your analogy the user was with some1 with syplis, well guess what, now the user has it too. So it doesn’t matter where he goes or what he does, the user’s pc is still compromised regardless if they know what sites were “fixed” or what not.
So SE knows it’s a keylogger, and since no one can figure out how to remove the code/program/etc, they are doing the most logical thing, allowing users to use an on screen keyboard, where a keylogger can’t get the password.
Now since they think they “know” how it all began with Real player, flash, w/ever, they figure the computer might be safe from “NEW” programs using the same method they used to infect with the “Old” Program.
Now as from them websites provided about known issues etc., there was always at least 2-4 weeks where the “ability to be compromised” is unknown. Just cause they find it after it’s been out in the public for a month, and took them a month to make patch, doesn’t mean the patch is going to fix what the computer might have infected with. The damage has been done. It takes time for them to know something’s wrong, then it’s going to take time for them to fix it. All that time, unless it’s emailed or televised, no one is going to know something’s wrong, until its way too late. So, is it still the User’s fault he was hacked? Even when ppl didn’t know, at the time even Real Player didn’t know, what the problem was?
Now the above statement is an analogy for the most part, but it can and will happen. How long with that version of Real Player out before ppl started to figure out something was wrong. Even SE didn’t believe the users when they started reporting something was wrong.
______________________________
Hmmm... let's just all agree it's Bill Gats's Fault and be done with it lol. | My god you're retarded.
How to clean is well known, the keylogger is easily identified by the majority of AV software.
What the problem was was known very early
Real Player/IE exploit: Order of the Blue Gartr • View topic - FFXI: JavaScript exploit on the loose(Repairs inside)
Flash: Another #$%@% virus warning.
The exploited holes were fixed over a month in advance.
The problem is PEBKAC. You're the type of person that runs a car into the ground then complains that the manufacturer should have done something to prevent it after it turns out you never topped up fluids or changed the oil. | | ::Quote Selected:: | | The following user says "Thank You" to Mhurron for above post: | | | 06-12-2008, 06:43 AM | #50 (permalink) | | Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Kinston, NC Posts: 121 Style: Light - Version 6 My Mood: Thanks: 28 Thanked 10x in 8 Posts Gil: 11,596 Bank: 17,137 Total Gil: 28,733 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer He's tried several AV software, they can't find it, and again, SE told him the only way to clean the system is a format/reinstall the system. I'm just going on what I know what he's doing. /shrug. If that makes me a retard, i guess i am. | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 06-12-2008, 07:02 AM | #51 (permalink) | | RANK 5 IS BULLSHIT! Oracle of Knowledge Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 7,002 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 1,732 Thanked 1,623x in 1,129 Posts Gil: 4,292 Bank: 890,539 Total Gil: 894,830 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer Originally Posted by Phanex | | SE told him the only way to clean the system is a format/reinstall the system. | Which, like I said, is why SE would be better off beefing up their customer support team than doing things like this. | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 06-12-2008, 07:09 AM | #52 (permalink) | | Junior Member Administrator Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 4,931 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 235 Thanked 683x in 348 Posts Gil: 28,806 Bank: 86,030 Total Gil: 114,836 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer Originally Posted by Phanex | So SE knows it’s a keylogger, and since no one can figure out how to remove the code/program/etc, they are doing the most logical thing, allowing users to use an on screen keyboard, where a keylogger can’t get the password.
Now since they think they “know” how it all began with Real player, flash, w/ever, they figure the computer might be safe from “NEW” programs using the same method they used to infect with the “Old” Program. | There's more than one way to skin a cat and there's more than one way to steal a password. The software keyboard eliminates one of two currently used vectors to get access to your account. But as long as users keep pretending they're helpless victims instead of stepping up and being responsible for their own security they're still wide open to future hacks.
Btw, am I to understand correctly that your friend is continuing to use a system he believes is infected with a keylogger because he thinks he can't get rid of it without reinstalling? That is profoundly lazy and irresponsible. Which would you rather do: spend an afternoon restoring your system from a wipe, or spend months on the phone with creditors trying to recover your life from an identity theft? But I guess if the latter happens he can just claim ignorance and helplessness. Originally Posted by Phanex | | Hmmm... let's just all agree it's Bill Gats's Fault and be done with it lol. | Dear god, are you even listening? Nobody is responsible for your personal safety but yourself. Blaming Bill Gates for an account theft is like blaming George Bush for getting mugged.  - | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 06-12-2008, 07:39 AM | #53 (permalink) | | Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Kinston, NC Posts: 121 Style: Light - Version 6 My Mood: Thanks: 28 Thanked 10x in 8 Posts Gil: 11,596 Bank: 17,137 Total Gil: 28,733 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer | Quote: | Originally Posted by Phanex
Hmmm... let's just all agree it's Bill Gats's Fault and be done with it lol.
Dear god, are you even listening? Nobody is responsible for your personal safety but yourself. Blaming Bill Gates for an account theft is like blaming George Bush for getting mugged. | Ok, this was just a joke that was what the "lol" was for, sorry i even said it. I forgot only a certain amount of peopel on this form can say something like that and people find it funny.
No he's not still using the system, he is using his 360 to play the game, yet he hasn't even got his old account back. And he lost his recovery CDs, his PC is old, he's just hasn't recived them yet from HP, they are on back order. But he's not worried about it anymore cause he likes the 360 better now.
All i was trying to say, is that there had to be a point in time where someone didn't know realplayer or whatever the program may be, was vulnerable untill it was too late. Untill it was already exploited and the programs where spread out. and to think someone wasn't compromised during that brief moment in time is just wrong.
In that link you gave us about the realplayer risk, they said they became "aware" of it on 10-18, and they released a patch on 10-23. Woot, that's real quick and real nice of them, but who's to say that the problem hasn't been out since 9-15? and then there were them 5 days of them working on the problem. Now if someone was infect those 5 days, then are they stupid cause they didn't know to download a patch that didnt' exsist until the 23rd?
This is my point, hackers are working 24/7 to exploit everything and the ppl who make the patches probley won't find it until "crap hits the fan" days later. That is my whole point. But no I must be wrong right? I'm sure someone will come up with some other excuse and what not. But that dosn't mean that there is always a certian amount of time that even windows update can not protect ur computer from what is out there UNTIL someone knows it's out there. | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 06-12-2008, 07:43 AM | #54 (permalink) | | Achiever Keeper of Knowledge Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Queens, NY Posts: 2,626 Style: Light - Version 4 My Mood: Thanks: 442 Thanked 238x in 139 Posts Gil: 5,472 Bank: 95,000 Total Gil: 100,472 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer I don't know why people still use Realplayer.
When I Google Sound Effects to use for the music mixes for our performances, if the format is .rm, I just leave the website and keep looking.
There are way too many GOOD media formats out there for me to be bothered downloading Real Player when I can't even cut the sfx into Primiere or Movie Maker.
But I feel bad for everyone who got exploited. People who don't know how to use computers should just get Macs. Originally Posted by Aksannyi | | I swear some melee would forget their fucking weapon if they didn't have it equipped every time they logged in. | | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 06-12-2008, 07:57 AM | #55 (permalink) | | RANK 5 IS BULLSHIT! Oracle of Knowledge Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 7,002 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 1,732 Thanked 1,623x in 1,129 Posts Gil: 4,292 Bank: 890,539 Total Gil: 894,830 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer Originally Posted by WishMaster3K | | People who don't know how to use computers shouldn't. | Fixed. Macs are not going to save a stupid user from themselves.
Are you going to get a keylogger? Almost certainly not. Are you going to still use insanely insecure practices, and suffer when someone takes advantage of it? Hell yes. Originally Posted by Phanex | | then are they stupid cause they didn't know to download a patch that didnt' exsist until the 23rd? | This is hardly ever the case. The majority of security exploits, especially ones used by groups that aren't really technically inclined like RMTs, are not Zero Day, and have been patched for awhile. Like Mhurron pointed out, we know when these attacks happened and when the patches were released. Your explanation is not valid.
RMT are not hackers. They are money grabbers. They look for what they can sell in online games for a quick buck. They go after low hanging fruit. In computer security terms, those fruits are people who don't take measures to protect themselves (and really, this is the case for almost all exploits in general). | | ::Quote Selected:: | | The following user says "Thank You" to Feba for above post: | | | 06-12-2008, 08:07 AM | #56 (permalink) | | Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Kinston, NC Posts: 121 Style: Light - Version 6 My Mood: Thanks: 28 Thanked 10x in 8 Posts Gil: 11,596 Bank: 17,137 Total Gil: 28,733 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer You see, that's all you had to do, was explain it to me. Although i'm sure Feba thinks i'm a tard, at least he didnt' say it outright. | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 06-12-2008, 08:19 AM | #57 (permalink) | | Junior Member Administrator Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 4,931 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 235 Thanked 683x in 348 Posts Gil: 28,806 Bank: 86,030 Total Gil: 114,836 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer Originally Posted by Phanex | | Ok, this was just a joke that was what the "lol" was for, sorry i even said it. I forgot only a certain amount of peopel on this form can say something like that and people find it funny. | Usually when someone says they were just kidding, it's half true. It's a hyperbole; I get it. It's not funny to be because I believe the underlying attitude of projecting your own responsibility onto someone else is not a joke to you. Originally Posted by Phanex | | In that link you gave us about the realplayer risk, they said they became "aware" of it on 10-18, and they released a patch on 10-23. Woot, that's real quick and real nice of them, but who's to say that the problem hasn't been out since 9-15? and then there were them 5 days of them working on the problem. Now if someone was infect those 5 days, then are they stupid cause they didn't know to download a patch that didnt' exsist until the 23rd? | The somepage iframe didn't surface until 12-12. At that point the security issue had been patched for nearly two months. Originally Posted by Phanex | | This is my point, hackers are working 24/7 to exploit everything and the ppl who make the patches probley won't find it until "crap hits the fan" days later. That is my whole point. But no I must be wrong right? I'm sure someone will come up with some other excuse and what not. But that dosn't mean that there is always a certian amount of time that even windows update can not protect ur computer from what is out there UNTIL someone knows it's out there. | In most cases patches are released for major security issues long before we hear about major exploitation of them. Heck, security patch notes are probably how a lot of hackers discover new vectors of infection. That's why it's so important to stay up to date on that stuff. But in some cases you're right and there's a small window in which the exploit exists without a fix as I believe was the case with the recent flash player issue, which is why it's so important for end users to do their due diligence to minimize their risk of infection. Most of this stuff requires little technical know-how or investment/ Look dude, I'm sorry your friend got hacked. Really I am. I know three people whose accounts got hijacked in this last round. All good, intelligent people for whom I have much respect. But that doesn't change the fact that ultimately each of them was the only person responsible for making sure they weren't vicitimized and they did an inadequate job of that.  - Last edited by Taskmage : 06-17-2008 at 09:46 PM. Reason: removed link to windower forums | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 06-12-2008, 08:47 AM | #58 (permalink) | | RANK 5 IS BULLSHIT! Oracle of Knowledge Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 7,002 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 1,732 Thanked 1,623x in 1,129 Posts Gil: 4,292 Bank: 890,539 Total Gil: 894,830 Donate | Re: Heightened Security on the Windows PlayOnline Viewer Originally Posted by Taskmage | | Secure your browser. | I'm going to recommend that you do even better and follow Taskmage's fourth bit of advice for your browser. Yes, firefox with NoScript and ABP and such is great, but you can do even better.
The most secure option is to have your browser completely separate from any vital information on your PC. The easiest ways to do this, in order, are A: Second computer, B: live CD, C: Virtual Machine/Browser Applicance, D: Dual boot.
Technically, the last three (and some setups of A) CAN still get access to your main system, but it's much harder, and extremely unlikely.
A- This is the easiest, but also the most expensive. Just buy another computer and use that for web browsing, email, and other things that are very insecure. All the better if you put something like Ubuntu on it.
B- Find a LiveCD, and boot off it whenever you want to search the web. I recommend something like DamnSmallLinux, which is made for the task, and which can be easily customized (for example, to add your custom bookmarks); although it won't work very well in all computers. Ubuntu will be much more fool proof and easier to use, but it's LiveCDs are more inclined towards installation than daily use, so they're pretty slow.
C- Browser Appliance is a virtual machine built to run firefox. Won't need to worry about rebooting your computer, although it will of course be slower than a regular browser.
D- Basically like B, except you install it instead of using a CD. Quicker, and still very easy to set up, but not as foolproof as the other options. | | ::Quote Selected:: | | The following user says "Thank You" to Feba for above post: | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | Posting Rules | You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:15 PM. | | |