[Yellow Mage]

Originally Posted by Omgwtfbbqkitten

I understood it the first time. The Virtue weapons point to the jobs that should be equipping the torques, even if the jobs dont exactly match up with them optimally. Thus the weapons had a purpose and use - they were the hint if this existing theory holds.

The torques could be considered what "bound" the virtue while the sin or "jailer" in this case kept it locked down during the fight. With AV being the embodiment of all virtue, to weaken him, you lock away his two hours with your job becoming the sin by "locking" away the virtue when you put on the torque and respond to his two hours with the corresponding job.

When I referenced Temperance Axe, I was simply pointing out it made no sense for RNG, so its meaning had to be something else. BST and RNG get it, WAR don't. We were looking at utility more than we were looking at the weapons as a hint.

Perhaps try reading my replies fully before responding next time

I read this fully. The best response I can come up with is, "Yes."

[Van'derfel]

Originally Posted by Omgwtfbbqkitten

Perhaps try reading my replies fully before responding next time

HERESY!

[Aksannyi]

Well, I can say that interest in my linkshell has been piqued. We have 5 JoL popsets sitting on a guy who hardly plays (but whose account was being used by someone else in the ls, and then he decided to change his password like a dick, oh yeah fun times) but we are doing JoL Saturday I believe.

There are now a good number of people in the linkshell who think that we should at least try once or twice, if for no other reason than to say we did it. Of course, whether or not we do is entirely up to Stan, and if he doesn't want to, we won't.

I'll keep you all posted if we have any new developments.

[Murphie]

Since when did I ever say something was pointless and/or meaningless without providing a bit more commentary? God, I don't post here for nearly a year, and BBQ is still so fucking butthurt that he can't keep my name out of his mouth. Pathetic.

[Yellow Mage]

Waitawutthe . . . buh?

. . . Murphie has a point, though: dragging his name in to this when he was not even previously involved in the discussion is the only thing that's "pointless" around here.

However, 'kitten's whole point of, "ohey, if discussion never gets around and it's all just assumed by everybody to not work, nobody is ever going to try it anyway" still stands. But he had no need to start the whole "in before" nonsense, but it wasn't like Sabaron was any better for bringing BG in to this . . .

So, yeah . . . dazed and confused, here . . .

[Aksannyi]

(Guess now would not be the best time to say I've missed you dude, how's it going?)

[Caspian]

Murphie!!!!!!!!
So if we want to see you again, we just have to post negative things about you? Its not ideal, but it'll have to do.

[Feba]

Originally Posted by Caspian

So if we want to see you again, we just have to post negative things about you?

I am going to take this as the moderation staff saying that flaming Murphie is A-OK, as long as you do it in the name of keeping him around.

Originally Posted by Omgwtfbbqkitten

So "in before" is just stuff retards from BG do, but coming in here with comments like "pointless" or "meaningless" (pretty much something Murphie used to do) isn't trolling at all?

Yeah, what was up with that Murphie guy anyway? Anybody else remember that time when he was like "Hey guys! I decapitated my dog, and then cooked the remains. They were good, but I wish I put it on tacos instead of pasta." What was up with that?

I mean, we don't care about your life anyway, and especially not your pets. And now you're wasting our time telling us about what you had for dinner? Substance or DIAF, man!

[eticket109]

I can handle that.

[Caspian]

Originally Posted by Feba

I am going to take this as the moderation staff saying that flaming Murphie is A-OK, as long as you do it in the name of keeping him around.

I think there's a loop-hole in the forum rules. Something about the "greater good" or something like that.
But don't quote me on that...

[Omgwtfbbqkitten]

Originally Posted by Murphie

Since when did I ever say something was pointless and/or meaningless without providing a bit more commentary?

Oh, just about any thread that contained speculation you'd swoop in and poo-poo on it as "pointless." I don't have to link them all, do I?

God, I don't post here for nearly a year, and BBQ is still so fucking butthurt that he can't keep my name out of his mouth. Pathetic.

What exactly makes you so butthurt that it broke nearly a year of silence from you? Using you as an example to Sabaron was all it took, apparently. I keenly remember some action on an mod's part making you so butthurt you left.

"Butthurt" seems to be the word of the week around here. Maybe you should learn what it means before you start throwing it around. Maybe if I make an example of those banned last week, they'll come over here all mad, too. They're butthurt.

Me butthurt over you, though? Don't flatter yourself.

[Feba]

Right, Murphie has just been sitting around silently contemplating the forums this entire time, just to reappear when someone says something mean about him.

Fact: Murphie spends all of his free time making sure nobody dislikes him on the internet.

Originally Posted by Omgwtfbbqkitten

"Butthurt" seems to be the word of the week around here. Maybe you should learn what it means before you start throwing it around.

He used the word once.

Also, I am pretty sure Murphie knows what butthurt means.

[hexx]

Damn this got derailed horrendously; back on topic, I'm gonna present this theory to a friend of mine who leads a sea shell and see what he thinks, if it comes to fruition ill let yall know as well.

[Balfree]

I will ban! I warn you! *makes a mean face*

[eticket109]

Originally Posted by Feba

Also, I am pretty sure Murphie knows what butthurt means.

This one is so obvious I'm just going to leave it here.