10-29-2007, 04:17 AM | #1 (permalink) | | Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 8 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0x in 0 Posts Gil: 1,335 Bank: 0 Total Gil: 1,335 Donate | MNK/SAM character a good idea? Is it a good idea to start as a monk and than sub as a samurai? | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 10-29-2007, 04:33 AM | #2 (permalink) | | Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 3 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0x in 0 Posts Gil: 122 Bank: 0 Total Gil: 122 Donate | Re: MNK/SAM character a good idea? Well, subbing samurai wont really be efficient until level 60, for Meditate, and even then subbing warrior is the better choice for overall damage. Ive also heard that Double Attack will get you as much extra tp as Meditate in the long run anyways.
Edit: Unless you mean taking Monk to 30 and then leveling Samurai as a main, in that case it would be better to do warrior first then samurai.  I have not failed, I have just found 10,000 ways that dont work. Last edited by Creudant : 10-29-2007 at 05:30 AM. Reason: I stupid. | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 10-29-2007, 04:46 AM | #3 (permalink) | | Sticky Paws Keeper of Knowledge Join Date: May 2006 Location: Southern California Posts: 2,892 Style: Light - Version 6 My Mood: Thanks: 237 Thanked 609x in 395 Posts Gil: 7,246 Bank: 119,181 Total Gil: 126,427 Donate | Re: MNK/SAM character a good idea? MNK/SAM isn't a great combination; neither Hasso nor Seigan works with Hand-to-Hand weapons, and Meditate has to wait until MNK60/SMN30.
SAM/MNK is even worse; there's a little more HP, a minimally useful Dodge at SAM30/MNK15, and a somewhat more useful Focus at SAM50/MNK25.
Go with MNK/WAR or SAM/WAR. >_>  “ I’m in pain, but I’m happy.”
“ It hurts, but I can smile.”
“ That’s why I can tell you from the depths of my being…” | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 10-29-2007, 03:07 PM | #4 (permalink) | | Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Auburn, ME Posts: 394 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 171 Thanked 116x in 69 Posts Gil: 17,780 Bank: 0 Total Gil: 17,780 Donate | Re: MNK/SAM character a good idea? MNK/SAM is less than optimal, but passable. MNK/WAR is more helpful, especially if you're going to be helping to accomodate a THF or /THF. That said, I wouldn't pass on a MNK/SAM just for going /SAM.
SAM/MNK, similar story, except that SAM is better-equipped to tank and to deal with grabbing hate than MNK, so /WAR stands out more as a sub. /MNK can work, but I'd be more likely to think twice about inviting a SAM/MNK than a MNK/SAM -- and I'm fairly open to unusual subjob choices.
The trouble with MNK and SAM working together is that many of their key abilities center on specific weapon types. Guarding skill and Martial Arts are no good if you don't use hand-to-hand (which SAM has no skill in), and Hasso and Seigan are no good if you don't use a two-handed weapon (while a MNK can use a staff, it's only with B skill compared to A+ skill for hand-to-hand, so many people will think you weird). -- Pteryx | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 10-30-2007, 03:53 AM | #5 (permalink) | | Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 8 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0x in 0 Posts Gil: 1,335 Bank: 0 Total Gil: 1,335 Donate | Re: MNK/SAM character a good idea? Meh... What about monk/beastmaster? I might pick mnk/ninja if there is nothing else
good.
Edit: Is it good to go black mage and monk? I really don't like to tank  | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 10-30-2007, 04:50 AM | #6 (permalink) | | Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 366 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 11 Thanked 47x in 31 Posts Gil: 4,355 Bank: 27,595 Total Gil: 31,949 Donate | Re: MNK/SAM character a good idea? /WAR is a good, all-purpose melee sub ... I could see /BST being slightly useful for soloing (if you can charm at all, I've seen some unusual discussions on that issue) and /NIN would be useful for shadows if you're taking too much damage as /WAR.
As for /BLM, that's just strange and pointless for PT play. People won't ASK you to tank except maybe in the Dunes, because it's not what a monk does well ... just don't pump out so much damage that you end up tanking anyway. | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 10-30-2007, 02:29 PM | #7 (permalink) | | Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Auburn, ME Posts: 394 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 171 Thanked 116x in 69 Posts Gil: 17,780 Bank: 0 Total Gil: 17,780 Donate | Re: MNK/SAM character a good idea? MNK/BST would work reasonably well for soloing, but would do little good in a party. BST in general is more of a solo job or subjob.
MNK/BLM... don't even go there. People will go out of their way to laugh at you if you put up your seek flag as MNK/BLM, because 1) BLM stats are wholly at odds with MNK's needs, meaning you'll be a considerably weaker MNK than your competition, and 2) MNK has no magic skills, so any spells you would cast would completely suck.
Frankly, you were more on track with MNK/SAM than with those ideas.
And yes, MNK is not a tank. At most, you'll tank in the Dunes (when any melee can) and, later, be a common "first voke" for parties that invite and actually properly cooperate with a THF or /THF, tanking for only a few seconds until the THF uses a weaponskill enhanced with Sneak Attack and Trick Attack to cement hate onto the real tank.
Note that if the "I don't want to tank" statement is because you don't want to level WAR... in the current environment, no one expects a WAR to tank beyond the Dunes. Most WARs are actually violently opposed to tanking. NINs, OTOH, are expected to tank. -- Pteryx Last edited by Pteryx : 10-30-2007 at 02:44 PM. Reason: A friend was an idiot for misparsing | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 10-31-2007, 04:22 AM | #8 (permalink) | | Ares's Cuirass Keeper of Knowledge Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,990 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 8 Thanked 31x in 25 Posts Gil: 1,017 Bank: 3,166 Total Gil: 4,183 Donate | Re: MNK/SAM character a good idea? Mnk/War to lv75 if you can, mages get whiney about having to heal you after 70ish so you may have to sub ninja. /nin for one Rdm supporting a whole PT is fine but if theres 2 mages and one hopefully isnt a Blm then theres no excuse for them not to let you /war. /war for mnk really just beats the rest by miles for Dmg output. 75 Mnk Sam | 70 Drk | 40 Blm | 37 Nin Rng Thf War
Woodworking 91.9+2
ZM:Complete CoP:Complete ToAU:27 | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 10-31-2007, 05:45 AM | #9 (permalink) | | Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Winston,GA Posts: 650 Style: Light - Version 6 My Mood: Thanks: 42 Thanked 23x in 21 Posts Gil: 5,511 Bank: 11,320 Total Gil: 16,832 Donate | Re: MNK/SAM character a good idea? Originally Posted by Aeolus | | Mnk/War to lv75 if you can, mages get whiney about having to heal you after 70ish so you may have to sub ninja. /nin for one Rdm supporting a whole PT is fine but if theres 2 mages and one hopefully isnt a Blm then theres no excuse for them not to let you /war. /war for mnk really just beats the rest by miles for Dmg output. | most monks don't tank at that high of a level...and as THF I can tall you that straight up DDs usually don't get hit that much.(unless they stupidly pull hate) | | ::Quote Selected:: | | 10-31-2007, 06:51 AM | #10 (permalink) | | Ares's Cuirass Keeper of Knowledge Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,990 Style: Light - Version 6 Thanks: 8 Thanked 31x in 25 Posts Gil: 1,017 Bank: 3,166 Total Gil: 4,183 Donate | Re: MNK/SAM character a good idea? I wasnt suggesting Mnk was tanking, Mnk will pull hate easy. You must have been partying with some bad DD's because unless your Plds got access to some major enmity gear its not hard to pull hate off a tank at 71+ playing Mnk/War even if there is a thf TAing or SATAing the tank. Most ninja's can bearly keep hate off Mnk/Nin before they ws in TP burns but thats mainly because of the retimer on voke. 75 Mnk Sam | 70 Drk | 40 Blm | 37 Nin Rng Thf War
Woodworking 91.9+2
ZM:Complete CoP:Complete ToAU:27 | | ::Quote Selected:: | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | Posting Rules | You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:10 AM. | | |