Go Back   Dreams in Vanadiel - Final Fantasy XI Forum > Dreams in Vana'diel - Main Topics > General FFXI Discussion > Ask SquareEnix Questions > Archive > February 2007 or earlier

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-23-2006, 06:01 AM   #1
The Silent Protagonist
Mythril Wings of Service
 
Omgwtfbbqkitten's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Windurst
Posts: 7,435
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 213
Thanked 2,275x in 1,235 Posts
My Mood:
Send a message via Skype™ to Omgwtfbbqkitten
   
AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

The lag in Whitegate is totally unpleasent, worse than it ever was in Jeuno. People idle infront of the Residential Area of Whitegate for hours and hours on end causing immense amounts of lag and framedrop while not truley doing anything. The should be autologged by the server after 10-15 mins with no exceptions. If keystrokes aren't being entered at the very least, they have no reason to be logged in.

Same goes for Besieged, but moreover, people under level 50 who do not qualify to participate in Assault as a mercenary have no place in Besieged. They should be removed from zone when Besieged begins and barred from participatiing entirely.

Today Titan had its first Level 6 Besieged and several players could not enter, yet there are at least 50 players well below 50 inside waiting for to begin. Mules with event gear on, no less.

This should not be happening and it makes the experience very unenjoyable. And people can say what they want about a level 40 WHM being helpful but they're still occupying a space a level 60-75 WHM could be doing more good in.

I'm also aware of the option to turn autolog on and off, however, I don't think this feature should apply to Al'Zahbi and Whitegate. Autolog should always be active in those zones
__________________
The Silent Protagonist's Blog


Sig by Ragman of the LBR Fan Art Forum
Omgwtfbbqkitten is online now   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 09:57 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
kiffkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 125
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omgwtfbbqkitten
And people can say what they want about a level 40 WHM being helpful but they're still occupying a space a level 60-75 WHM could be doing more good in.
Why should a level 60 WHM be there, when a level 75 WHM could be there instead. Oh, and should we count how many merits people have, and of what sort, so that only people you approve of can play?
Leave the sanctimonious drivel out of here, please. If you've got Cure III, can Raise and can keep out of trouble, you're useful in Beseiged.
__________________
I have heard that those who celebrate life
walk safely amongst the wild animals.
When they go into battle, they remain unharmed,
the animals find no place to attack them
and weapons are unable to harm them.
Why? Because they find no place for death in them.
kiffkin is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 10:01 AM   #3
Jei
J...atatouille
Super Moderator
Wings of Honor
 
Jei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,416
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 5
Thanked 177x in 120 Posts
My Mood:
Send a message via MSN to Jei
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

Since besiege is a non cap event I think you can't really prevent low level players from entering the zone. However, AFK players.... At least they should give you a confirmation box you know.

"Besiege is taking place. If you want to participate, click {OK}. Count 5.. 4.. 3.. 2.. 1.."
__________________
There are painters who transform the sun into a yellow spot,
but there are others who with the help of their art and their intelligence
transform a yellow spot into the sun.

- Pablo Picasso
Jei is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 10:22 AM   #4
Senior Member
Brass Ribbon of Service
 
Celeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,058
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 316
Thanked 78x in 69 Posts
My Mood:
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

Try turn off all shadows while you are in Whitegate... well, at least it helps me.
__________________
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Race: Hume Rank 7
75 PLD, 75 SAM, 75 WAR, 75 NIN, 75 MNK, 65 BLU
Celeal is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 10:26 AM   #5
Ares's Cuirass
Allied Ribbon of Bravery
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,983
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 8
Thanked 31x in 25 Posts
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

I was told that if you dont move at all in the 10minutes before besieged you get kicked to Whitegate, is that not actually true then? Its doesnt really matter imo neway when we bet lv5 besieged with 200ppl in the zone on hades on more than one occasion. Of course maybe lv6 is insanely harder.
__________________
75 Mnk Sam | 70 Drk | 40 Blm | 37 Nin Rng Thf War
Woodworking 91.9+2
ZM:Complete CoP:Complete ToAU:27
Aeolus is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 10:27 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Lambeaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 477
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 18
Thanked 11x in 7 Posts
My Mood:
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

I logged into a besieged as a level 4 DRG once. LOL, that was entertaining.
__________________

Thanks for the sig, Selphiie!!

FFXI Xbox360 user ----- BLM 63 / RDM 36/ WHM 42 / THF 25
DRK 26 / BST 21 / DRG 17 / WAR 17 / MNK 10 / SMN 9 / PUP 4 /
BLU 1 / PLD 1 / BRD 1 / RNG 1 / NIN 1 / SAM 1
Bonecraft 63 / Leathercraft 19 / Fishing 7 Windhurst Rank 5
Lambeaus is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 10:33 AM   #7
Likes to n00k
Bronze Ribbon of Service
 
Haggai's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 557
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 8
Thanked 22x in 17 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Haggai
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jei View Post
Since besiege is a non cap event I think you can't really prevent low level players from entering the zone. However, AFK players.... At least they should give you a confirmation box you know.

"Besiege is taking place. If you want to participate, click {OK}. Count 5.. 4.. 3.. 2.. 1.."
That's a really good idea! You should suggest that to SE. Maybe more like a 10 second counter and if you don't click okay, it dumps you in Whitegate, much like when I logged into my Mog House on the Al Zahbi side during a Besieged.

As for a level cap, that is a little unfair, as my WHM40 is much more useful in Besieged than my BLM65, just for the simple fact that I can cast haste on my WHM. Sure, I'm lacking in MP, but with the temp items, it's not such a big deal.

Kicking out afk people is a good idea, though.
__________________
Haggai

i Am ThE bLaCk MaGe.
I cAsTs ThE sPeLlS tHaT mAkEs ThE pEoPlEs FaLl DoWn.
Haggai is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 12:55 PM   #8
The Silent Protagonist
Mythril Wings of Service
 
Omgwtfbbqkitten's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Windurst
Posts: 7,435
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 213
Thanked 2,275x in 1,235 Posts
My Mood:
Send a message via Skype™ to Omgwtfbbqkitten
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiffkin View Post
Why should a level 60 WHM be there, when a level 75 WHM could be there instead. Oh, and should we count how many merits people have, and of what sort, so that only people you approve of can play?
Leave the sanctimonious drivel out of here, please. If you've got Cure III, can Raise and can keep out of trouble, you're useful in Beseiged.
Its a valid complaint many players have. When the criteria for ToA Assault Missions and general content is set at 50+, why should we have mules and level 20 players running around in besieged?

I was actually being generous with my argument, some people think only 70+ should be in there or that it should be a 75 only thing. And if that were the case, we'd lose every time no matter how many merits they had.

But There are also people who are AFK the whole time as a high level job, too, what's even more amazing is when Besieged is over and they come back - they're surprised we've lost the astral candescance. Gee, I wonder why? Could it be because you were AFK two hours and people who wanted to be useful couldn't get in?

Not to mention on the Whitegate side of things, I don't particularly like waiting a minute for things in my MH and the AH to load up. AFK players should simply be removed from these areas to make things easier on those actively playing the game.

In any case, the people who are totally AFK should be removed, I know that sometimes that level 36 DRG is just a guy trying to get the the warp taru and got stuck in Besieged. Still, there is another warp taru he could have used.
__________________
The Silent Protagonist's Blog


Sig by Ragman of the LBR Fan Art Forum

Last edited by Omgwtfbbqkitten; 10-23-2006 at 01:03 PM.
Omgwtfbbqkitten is online now   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 01:00 PM   #9
Pointy Stick
Allied Ribbon of Glory
 
eticket109's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,091
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 488
Thanked 375x in 234 Posts
My Mood:
Send a message via AIM to eticket109
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiffkin View Post
Why should a level 60 WHM be there, when a level 75 WHM could be there instead. Oh, and should we count how many merits people have, and of what sort, so that only people you approve of can play?
Leave the sanctimonious drivel out of here, please. If you've got Cure III, can Raise and can keep out of trouble, you're useful in Beseiged.
I agree word for word. Heck, my wife has a 40 rdm and she does Beseiged all the time. She goes around keeping people cured and raising people. Could a 75 whm do a better job of it then her? Sure, but for every person she raises, there's more mp for the WHMs to use to focus on healing.

They need to focus on the afk people in Beseiged and not worry about the levels of people in there.
__________________


Wii code: 6851 9579 6989 9039
eticket109 is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 01:13 PM   #10
Digital Wizard
Super Moderator
Holyknight Emblem
 
Icemage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 6,240
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 72
Thanked 535x in 347 Posts
My Mood:
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

Everyone talks about WHM and RDM in the context of Besieged as being useful, but I dare you to tell me what a DRG40 is going to do there other than increase the lag for other players.

Frankly, Besieged is an abject failure at the design level. It greatly favors specific jobs (mages, tanks), and in fact encourages people to not bring their best jobs to the table, since it's relatively easy to get XP at level 70+.

It's gotten to the point where I don't even want to do Besieged; why should I help other players defend it when the Candescence doesn't do much for me, and so very few take it seriously anyway? Civic charity? I have better uses for my limited playtime than that.


Icemage
Icemage is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 01:37 PM   #11
Veteran Member
Allied Ribbon of Bravery
 
little ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,880
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 5
Thanked 28x in 22 Posts
My Mood:
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icemage View Post
Everyone talks about WHM and RDM in the context of Besieged as being useful, but I dare you to tell me what a DRG40 is going to do there other than increase the lag for other players.
Frankly, Besieged is an abject failure at the design level. It greatly favors specific jobs (mages, tanks), and in fact encourages people to not bring their best jobs to the table, since it's relatively easy to get XP at level 70+.
It's gotten to the point where I don't even want to do Besieged; why should I help other players defend it when the Candescence doesn't do much for me, and so very few take it seriously anyway? Civic charity? I have better uses for my limited playtime than that.
Icemage
LoL so true, so true. except ice you forgot to comment that those dragoons are /whm auto folloing npcs an cure bombing them for points at the end.

At 75 with +40 acc gear an +4 axe merits, i still have a hard time landing hits without food. An thats on lvl 3 forces. what use are they at lvl 4 or higher forces. so i cant see how any other job lower then 75 in besieged would be helpful other the whm or rdm.

But i do agree with the O.P. We do need some way to log players out of the zone for besieged, Not to mention eliminate the home points out of the M.H

I agree with you ICE. Defending the candy an getting it back is useless to me. since ive never really used it..
__________________

Nin75, Bst75. Drk61, War61, Rdm40, All other jobs are 37. All 3 starting city missions completed. All Zilart missions completed. All CoP missions completed. TouA completed.
little ninja is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 01:43 PM   #12
Pointy Stick
Allied Ribbon of Glory
 
eticket109's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,091
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 488
Thanked 375x in 234 Posts
My Mood:
Send a message via AIM to eticket109
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

I agree, there is a large difference between a 40 DD and a 40 mage in there. Heck, even a 40 blm won't be much of anything but a glorified cure hound. Once again though, I'd rather have the acceptance system in place to get rid of afkers then have some sort of cap on it.
__________________


Wii code: 6851 9579 6989 9039
eticket109 is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 02:09 PM   #13
Jei
J...atatouille
Super Moderator
Wings of Honor
 
Jei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,416
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 5
Thanked 177x in 120 Posts
My Mood:
Send a message via MSN to Jei
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

They should devide more Besiege zones kinda like how DAoC has battle grounds for each level range. Make it so that there's defensive forts around the city in seperate zones and have level range corresponse to it. 65-75 defense the main city, 55-65 defend the eastern tower, 40-55 out post, something like that would be interesting. And adjust the amount of enemy to kinda fit the amount of players in each level range.
__________________
There are painters who transform the sun into a yellow spot,
but there are others who with the help of their art and their intelligence
transform a yellow spot into the sun.

- Pablo Picasso
Jei is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 02:20 PM   #14
Veteran Member
Allied Ribbon of Bravery
 
little ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,880
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 5
Thanked 28x in 22 Posts
My Mood:
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jei View Post
They should devide more Besiege zones kinda like how DAoC has battle grounds for each level range. Make it so that there's defensive forts around the city in seperate zones and have level range corresponse to it. 65-75 defense the main city, 55-65 defend the eastern tower, 40-55 out post, something like that would be interesting. And adjust the amount of enemy to kinda fit the amount of players in each level range.
Cause that would be far to much work for S.E to do. They are just happy with jamming alot of high lvl mobs into a small area, an having them spam 1k AoE that drop 50+ people.

Not to mention not that many low lvls are in a zone. Hell if there are i rarely see them, but ever now an again. Mobs dont load up, players dont load up.

Honestly though i really hate the lag in an around the M.H an the A.H. I wish S,E would do something about it.
__________________

Nin75, Bst75. Drk61, War61, Rdm40, All other jobs are 37. All 3 starting city missions completed. All Zilart missions completed. All CoP missions completed. TouA completed.
little ninja is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
Old 10-23-2006, 02:20 PM   #15
Pai Pai Lackey
Iron Emblem of Service
 
Macht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,234
Style: Light Theme V7

Thanks: 4
Thanked 29x in 24 Posts
   
Re: AFK Players in Whitegate and Besieged: Why aren't they autologged?

Eh, given that my subjob is often useless in the Besieges I usually just slap /WHM regardless of what my main is. Since the event seems to regen your MP even the weak little 100 MP or so is pretty effective to getting exp. If you happen to land a hit it's almost like you are getting 100-70 exp for it (Well for me anyways that's what it's been).

Only reason I could see that they made them hard to hit is because it's intent was to keep the monster alive long enough to everyone attacking can get a few hits off. In an event like this seriously think how can EXP effectively be awareded. The only thing I see that is targetable to a specific object is a successfull hit.

So if they make the mobs to easy to hit then you'll have people just destroying the mobs and reducing the over all successfull hits and so take away potential EXP. The only real flaw they had done was giving such huge EXP benefits for WHM's Curing and capping overall rewards of EXP from the event at a way to low of a point.

Doesn't make it worth it when an ENM can give you 3k for 30 min. of effort when this gives you 700 for 1-2hrs. of effort. If the potential EXP was more like 6k-8k then it would be more enticing.

Yeah, as far as a notification the only issue I have with it. Is that an electing to join the fight directly defies the game's story. You know were they specifically stated everyone is drafted. What would be more in-line to the story is if players are caught afk through the event, not assisting in it at all then a corporal punishment is delt to them.

Maybe a negative stats or something they get stuck with until they participate in a future Besiege, have it add up and once they got like 2-3 negative stats then if they are there during a Besiege a different cutscene triggers in which they are thrown in a prison cell for the length of the Besiege event as amendment for their actions. Lol, even an ass would lose intrest after a while if they are getting tacked with negatives stats they can't get rid of easily. That makes them harder to get EXP and whatnot. Also it keeps the game story in tact.

As far as people loitering the game by default is set to log you out after 15 min. of no activity. If they aren't being logged out then the person is expressing their right given by Square Enix to loiter there. In other words they changed their settings to not log them out, an option Square Enix provided and has been there for years. If any of you have changed you settings to not log you out, then you really have no reason to complain. I mean seriously why would your rights be any better then someone elses.
__________________


Cheezy Test Result (I am nerdier than 96% of all people. Are you nerdier? Click here to find out!)

Last edited by Macht; 10-23-2006 at 02:29 PM.
Macht is offline   Button by Aksannyi :)
 

Tags
afk, autologged, besieged, players, whitegate
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:03 AM.
Site Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC2
©2001-2009 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved. Title Design by Yoshitaka Amano.
FINAL FANTASY and VANA'DIEL are registered trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd. SQUARE ENIX, PLAYONLINE and the PlayOnline logo are trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
Comments and posts are property of their authors. All the rest, including video, articles, compiled game data, and sections, unless otherwise noted, are
©2002-2009 FFXIOnline.com: Dreams in Vana'diel. All rights reserved.

no new posts
Page generated in 1.17167 seconds with 25 queries