View Single Post
Old 06-15-2008, 03:18 PM   #15 (permalink)
Omgwtfbbqkitten
C'mon baby, don't fight over me
FFXIWiki Team
 
Omgwtfbbqkitten's Avatar
FFXI Character Info.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Windurst
Posts: 5,051
Style:
My Mood:
Thanks: 173
Thanked 1,503x in 822 Posts
Gil: 30,916
Bank: 65,997
Total Gil: 96,913
Donate
Re: Toying with the idea of DRG/COR
Originally Posted by Lmnop View Post
I think the "you should take care of yourself" outlook is precisely the same as the melee burn outlook, 'bbq.
Except that the option to fix your own accuracy has been there since the days of CoPs and its only become cheaper - sushi. Not only that, the options for accuracy gear have only increased and gotten cheaper and cheaper. If my COR can come with enough accuracy to hit a mob, what is the melees' excuse?

And why should I dole out a buff that can be covered by food and gear when I can offer better things? Doesn't matter if I'm COR or BRD - there are some avenues you take care of on your own.

I know pretty damn well there are RDMs that won't spend the MP to haste you if you don't already have haste gear. I can't say that I blame them. Why should they make the effort when its clear thier PT members clearly don't care about improving their own performance?

Quote:
But /cor doesn't play like /brd. /brd is weak and takes all your DPS time away.
/COR and /BRD don't offer any advantageous job traits, both take away from your DPS. Both offer comprable buffs, Healer's and Samurai being the only real exclusive difference. COR buffs take longer or shorter to get out than a BRD buff, its highly variable, but I've had plenty of long double-ups.

Gimp your DRG if you want, but the deficiencies of others are not of my concern. Jobs such as COR, BRD and RDM are there to enhance the PT members, not un-gimp them.





Sig by Ragman of the LBR Fan Art Forum
Omgwtfbbqkitten is offline   ::Quote Selected:: Reply With Quote
The following user says "Thank You" to Omgwtfbbqkitten for above post:
eticket109 (06-16-2008)
 
Page generated in 0.17175 seconds with 14 queries