| Quote: |
| Assuming the pld and whm were as bad as you say, I think staying in Addendum White and AoEing buffs would've been the best use of strategems. You can't fix the whm but you can largely mitigate the pld with stoneskin and phalanx. |
Well, I'd agree, but what good does the mitigation do when the PLD makes no genuine effort to tank to start with? I still don't think running into AoE range constantly would have been a great idea since Amnesia would have knocked out a subsequent Strategem for a signifigant period of time. Silence wasn't an issue, I just bring drops for that. I could have gotten Phalanx off a lot, probably, but I have doubts about Stoneskin since the casting time is quite a bit longer.
At any rate it was the first PT I really ever had problems with since taking up the job. I've had PTs with weak melees, but that's never as bad as a weak healer or tank.
| Quote: |
| i may have a bias due to being a DNC but i know i hate it when SCH use enspells and half the partys im in they are told not to do it at all because it over rights sambas which are alot more useful(at least in my eyes) and tbh i Would pull before a rng did anyday i even forced a rnger to let me pull once because they ate my tp and mages mp because of the eva issue they have while i had B+ with 3 traits to it. |
Yeah, SCH and DNC don't mesh on proc effects. I tend to see Enspells as novelty unless the mob has a weakness to a specific element and the matching day happens to be going on. I don't use then with a DNC present. I'd only disagree about Sambas in the case of Haste Samba, which is pretty weak, Drain and Aspir Samba would be more worthwhile.